tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: policy_closure
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:06:43.701247'
|
|
overall_score: 1.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess
|
|
precision or conceptual distinctness. Without any definitional content, this entity
|
|
fails to establish what "policy closure" means or how it differs from related
|
|
concepts.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: With no definition, context, or source chapter specified, there is no
|
|
evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The term "policy closure"
|
|
does not appear to be terminology that Smith himself would have used in The Wealth
|
|
of Nations.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The domain is listed as "unspecified," providing no guidance on thematic
|
|
or economic categorization. Without knowing what policy closure refers to, it's
|
|
impossible to assess whether it belongs in trade, labor, capital, or another economic
|
|
domain.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The term "policy" suggests potential relevance to S5 (identity/policy)
|
|
in the VSM framework, but without a definition, the nature of "closure" and its
|
|
systemic function remains unclear. This prevents meaningful VSM mapping beyond
|
|
superficial keyword matching.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: An undefined entity provides zero explanatory power and illuminates no
|
|
mechanisms or structural relations. Without content, it cannot contribute to understanding
|
|
either Smith's economic theory or its VSM interpretation.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Policy Closure
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess precision or conceptual distinctness. Without any definitional content, this entity fails to establish what "policy closure" means or how it differs from related concepts.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
With no definition, context, or source chapter specified, there is no evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The term "policy closure" does not appear to be terminology that Smith himself would have used in The Wealth of Nations.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The domain is listed as "unspecified," providing no guidance on thematic or economic categorization. Without knowing what policy closure refers to, it's impossible to assess whether it belongs in trade, labor, capital, or another economic domain.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The term "policy" suggests potential relevance to S5 (identity/policy) in the VSM framework, but without a definition, the nature of "closure" and its systemic function remains unclear. This prevents meaningful VSM mapping beyond superficial keyword matching.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
An undefined entity provides zero explanatory power and illuminates no mechanisms or structural relations. Without content, it cannot contribute to understanding either Smith's economic theory or its VSM interpretation.
|