tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
63 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: public_tranquillity
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:14:21.921458'
|
|
overall_score: 1.6
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess
|
|
precision or distinctness. Without any definitional content, this entity fails
|
|
to establish what concept it represents.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: While "public tranquillity" appears as a phrase in Smith's work, particularly
|
|
in discussions of justice and government functions, the complete absence of context
|
|
and definition makes it unclear whether this entity accurately represents Smith's
|
|
usage. The term exists in the source but lacks proper grounding in this representation.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: With no specified domain and no definition or context, it's impossible
|
|
to assess whether the entity is correctly categorized. The domain placement is
|
|
entirely absent rather than correct or incorrect.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Public tranquillity as a concept could potentially map to S3 (internal
|
|
regulation) or S5 (policy/identity) systems in VSM terms, as it relates to social
|
|
order and governance functions. However, without proper definition and context,
|
|
this mapping remains speculative.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: In its current form with no definition, context, or domain specification,
|
|
this entity provides zero explanatory value. It merely presents a label without
|
|
illuminating any mechanisms, relationships, or structural elements from Smith's
|
|
work.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Public Tranquillity
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess precision or distinctness. Without any definitional content, this entity fails to establish what concept it represents.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
While "public tranquillity" appears as a phrase in Smith's work, particularly in discussions of justice and government functions, the complete absence of context and definition makes it unclear whether this entity accurately represents Smith's usage. The term exists in the source but lacks proper grounding in this representation.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
With no specified domain and no definition or context, it's impossible to assess whether the entity is correctly categorized. The domain placement is entirely absent rather than correct or incorrect.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Public tranquillity as a concept could potentially map to S3 (internal regulation) or S5 (policy/identity) systems in VSM terms, as it relates to social order and governance functions. However, without proper definition and context, this mapping remains speculative.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
In its current form with no definition, context, or domain specification, this entity provides zero explanatory value. It merely presents a label without illuminating any mechanisms, relationships, or structural elements from Smith's work.
|