tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: regulated_company
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:16:52.238822'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes regulated companies from joint-stock
|
|
companies by the key feature that members trade on individual accounts rather
|
|
than pooling capital. This captures a distinct organizational form with specific
|
|
operational characteristics.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Smith explicitly discusses regulated companies in Book V, Chapter 1,
|
|
contrasting them with joint-stock companies and describing their structure where
|
|
members pay fees but trade individually. This is directly grounded in the source
|
|
text.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Placement in the "Exchange" domain is appropriate since regulated companies
|
|
are fundamentally about organizing trading relationships and market participation.
|
|
This fits perfectly within exchange mechanisms and structures.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: While regulated companies have some organizational structure (S2 coordination
|
|
through regulations, S3 internal rules), they lack the integrated operational
|
|
unity typical of viable systems since members operate independently. They represent
|
|
a loose coordination mechanism rather than a cohesive system.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity illuminates an important middle ground in Smith's taxonomy
|
|
of trading organizations, showing how commercial activity can be organized between
|
|
pure individual trading and fully integrated joint-stock operations. It reveals
|
|
a specific structural mechanism for balancing coordination with individual autonomy.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Regulated Company
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes regulated companies from joint-stock companies by the key feature that members trade on individual accounts rather than pooling capital. This captures a distinct organizational form with specific operational characteristics.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Smith explicitly discusses regulated companies in Book V, Chapter 1, contrasting them with joint-stock companies and describing their structure where members pay fees but trade individually. This is directly grounded in the source text.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Placement in the "Exchange" domain is appropriate since regulated companies are fundamentally about organizing trading relationships and market participation. This fits perfectly within exchange mechanisms and structures.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
While regulated companies have some organizational structure (S2 coordination through regulations, S3 internal rules), they lack the integrated operational unity typical of viable systems since members operate independently. They represent a loose coordination mechanism rather than a cohesive system.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates an important middle ground in Smith's taxonomy of trading organizations, showing how commercial activity can be organized between pure individual trading and fully integrated joint-stock operations. It reveals a specific structural mechanism for balancing coordination with individual autonomy.
|