tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: sober_people
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:22:31.975151'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes "sober people" as productive borrowers
|
|
who pay reasonable interest rates based on expected returns, contrasting them
|
|
with speculators. The concept is well-bounded and captures a distinct economic
|
|
actor type rather than being vague or circular.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book II, Chapter
|
|
4 about how appropriate interest rate regulation channels capital toward productive
|
|
borrowers rather than speculators. Smith explicitly discusses this category of
|
|
borrower as beneficial to the economy.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Accumulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept
|
|
deals with how capital is allocated and employed productively through borrowing
|
|
and lending mechanisms. This is central to Smith's theory of capital accumulation.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S1 (as
|
|
primary economic operators) or S3 (as part of the regulatory mechanism that ensures
|
|
productive capital allocation). However, it's more of an actor category than a
|
|
clear systemic function.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The entity provides significant explanatory value by illuminating the
|
|
mechanism through which interest rate policy affects capital allocation and economic
|
|
productivity. It helps explain how financial regulation can channel resources
|
|
toward beneficial rather than speculative uses.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Sober People
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes "sober people" as productive borrowers who pay reasonable interest rates based on expected returns, contrasting them with speculators. The concept is well-bounded and captures a distinct economic actor type rather than being vague or circular.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book II, Chapter 4 about how appropriate interest rate regulation channels capital toward productive borrowers rather than speculators. Smith explicitly discusses this category of borrower as beneficial to the economy.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Accumulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept deals with how capital is allocated and employed productively through borrowing and lending mechanisms. This is central to Smith's theory of capital accumulation.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S1 (as primary economic operators) or S3 (as part of the regulatory mechanism that ensures productive capital allocation). However, it's more of an actor category than a clear systemic function.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The entity provides significant explanatory value by illuminating the mechanism through which interest rate policy affects capital allocation and economic productivity. It helps explain how financial regulation can channel resources toward beneficial rather than speculative uses.
|