tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: wholesale_trade
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:39:21.131398'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes wholesale from retail trade based
|
|
on quantity sold and customer type (businesses vs. consumers). It also captures
|
|
Smith's specific insight about the relationship between apparent profits and genuine
|
|
returns to capital.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis from Book I, Chapter
|
|
10, where he explicitly contrasts wholesale and retail trade to illustrate profit
|
|
differentials. The distinction between "apparent profits" and "genuine profits"
|
|
reflects Smith's actual argument about returns to capital.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: '"Exchange" is the correct domain placement, as wholesale trade is fundamentally
|
|
about the mechanisms and structures of market exchange. This fits perfectly within
|
|
Smith''s broader analysis of commercial systems and trade relationships.'
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Wholesale trade maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as a
|
|
core economic activity, but it's primarily a descriptive category of commercial
|
|
activity rather than a cybernetic function. It doesn't naturally align with the
|
|
regulatory or intelligence functions of higher VSM systems.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: "This entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's\
|
|
\ economic theory\u2014how different forms of trade reflect different relationships\
|
|
\ between risk, capital, and profit. It helps explain the deeper logic behind\
|
|
\ apparent profit differentials across commercial employments."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Wholesale Trade
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes wholesale from retail trade based on quantity sold and customer type (businesses vs. consumers). It also captures Smith's specific insight about the relationship between apparent profits and genuine returns to capital.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis from Book I, Chapter 10, where he explicitly contrasts wholesale and retail trade to illustrate profit differentials. The distinction between "apparent profits" and "genuine profits" reflects Smith's actual argument about returns to capital.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
"Exchange" is the correct domain placement, as wholesale trade is fundamentally about the mechanisms and structures of market exchange. This fits perfectly within Smith's broader analysis of commercial systems and trade relationships.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Wholesale trade maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as a core economic activity, but it's primarily a descriptive category of commercial activity rather than a cybernetic function. It doesn't naturally align with the regulatory or intelligence functions of higher VSM systems.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's economic theory—how different forms of trade reflect different relationships between risk, capital, and profit. It helps explain the deeper logic behind apparent profit differentials across commercial employments.
|