tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: window_tax
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:39:29.139581'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is clear and specific, identifying the window tax as a
|
|
house tax based on window count with noted assessment advantages but distributional
|
|
problems. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct fiscal mechanism rather
|
|
than a vague concept.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual discussion of taxation
|
|
methods in Book V, Chapter 2, where he explicitly analyzes the window tax as an
|
|
example of house taxation. The characterization of its convenience versus inequality
|
|
reflects Smith's own assessment.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The placement in "General Theory" domain is appropriate as this represents
|
|
Smith's theoretical analysis of taxation principles and methods. The window tax
|
|
serves as a concrete example within his broader theoretical framework on public
|
|
finance.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The window tax has some VSM relevance as a regulatory mechanism (S3)
|
|
for resource extraction and potentially S2 for coordination of public finance,
|
|
but it's primarily a specific policy instrument rather than a core systemic function.
|
|
It's more VSM-applicable than purely abstract concepts but not naturally systemic.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory value by illustrating Smith's
|
|
analysis of how tax design affects both administrative efficiency and distributional
|
|
equity. It demonstrates the trade-offs between practical implementation and fairness
|
|
in fiscal policy, revealing important structural tensions in taxation.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Window Tax
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is clear and specific, identifying the window tax as a house tax based on window count with noted assessment advantages but distributional problems. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct fiscal mechanism rather than a vague concept.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual discussion of taxation methods in Book V, Chapter 2, where he explicitly analyzes the window tax as an example of house taxation. The characterization of its convenience versus inequality reflects Smith's own assessment.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The placement in "General Theory" domain is appropriate as this represents Smith's theoretical analysis of taxation principles and methods. The window tax serves as a concrete example within his broader theoretical framework on public finance.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The window tax has some VSM relevance as a regulatory mechanism (S3) for resource extraction and potentially S2 for coordination of public finance, but it's primarily a specific policy instrument rather than a core systemic function. It's more VSM-applicable than purely abstract concepts but not naturally systemic.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides genuine explanatory value by illustrating Smith's analysis of how tax design affects both administrative efficiency and distributional equity. It demonstrates the trade-offs between practical implementation and fairness in fiscal policy, revealing important structural tensions in taxation.
|