tegwick
574bb11db6
Demonstrates infospace composition: the Wealth of Nations infospace is used as a discipline, applying Smith's economic framework as a lens to analyse modern supply chain management concepts. New example: examples/supply-chain-vsm/ - infospace.yaml binding WoN as discipline (../infospace-with-history) - 3 source documents: coordination mechanisms, capital & inventory, market structure (~400 words each, original content) - supply-chain-entity-schema-v1.0.md with WoN Concept required section - won-mapping-schema-v1.0.md with Conceptual Continuity rating - artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md — 12 curated WoN entities for injection as discipline context - 8 hand-crafted entity files demonstrating LLM output format - 3 mapping files with full rationale and VSM inheritance chains - Viable: YES (5/5 thresholds) Key mappings demonstrated: Demand Signal → Effectual Demand (Strong, S2) Vendor-Managed Inventory → Division of Labour (Strong, S1/S2) Just-in-Time Inventory → Circulating Capital (Strong, S1/S3) Bullwhip Effect → Natural Price (Moderate, S2) Platform Intermediary → Merchant Capital (Strong, S2/S4) Monopsony Power → Combination of Masters (Strong, S3*) Platform fix: entity_parser.py now recognises ## Supply Chain Domain as a domain alias for ## Economic Domain, enabling composed infospaces to use their own domain section name. Tutorial §13 rewritten with real commands, real output, and the full mapping table from the demo. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
60 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
60 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# Supply Chain Entity Schema v1.0
|
||
|
||
Every extracted entity must contain the following sections in this order.
|
||
|
||
## Required Sections
|
||
|
||
### H1 Heading
|
||
|
||
The entity name in title case. Should be a noun phrase identifying a
|
||
distinct concept, mechanism, or structure in supply chain management.
|
||
|
||
Example: `# Bullwhip Effect`
|
||
|
||
### Definition
|
||
|
||
20–150 words. Precise, non-circular definition of the concept. Must
|
||
identify what it is, not just what it does. Avoid defining a term
|
||
using the term itself.
|
||
|
||
### Source
|
||
|
||
The source document this entity was extracted from, citing section
|
||
if available. Format: `[Source Name], [Section]`
|
||
|
||
### Supply Chain Domain
|
||
|
||
One of: **Coordination**, **Capital Management**, **Market Structure**,
|
||
**Risk**, **Logistics**
|
||
|
||
### VSM Assignment
|
||
|
||
One of: S1, S2, S3, S3*, S4, S5 — which layer of the Viable System Model
|
||
this entity primarily inhabits. Brief rationale (one sentence).
|
||
|
||
### WoN Concept
|
||
|
||
The Wealth of Nations concept this entity most directly corresponds to.
|
||
State the WoN entity name and a one-sentence explanation of the connection.
|
||
If no direct correspondence exists, state "No direct WoN analogue" and
|
||
explain why.
|
||
|
||
## Optional Sections
|
||
|
||
### Modern Context
|
||
|
||
Additional notes on how the concept has evolved since Smith's time, or
|
||
how it differs from its classical form.
|
||
|
||
## Quality Metrics
|
||
|
||
Evaluation rubric for per-entity LLM assessment:
|
||
|
||
- **Definition Precision** (1–5): Is the definition specific, non-circular,
|
||
and distinguishable from adjacent concepts?
|
||
- **Source Grounding** (1–5): Is the entity grounded in the source material?
|
||
- **Domain Placement** (1–5): Is the supply chain domain assignment correct?
|
||
- **WoN Relevance** (1–5): Is the WoN mapping substantive and well-reasoned?
|
||
- **Explanatory Value** (1–5): Does this entity contribute to understanding
|
||
modern supply chains through the WoN lens?
|