tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: agricultural_demand
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:26:18.797644'
|
|
overall_score: 4.4
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes agricultural demand as market demand
|
|
specifically for agricultural products, with clear causal links to prices and
|
|
rents. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept, though
|
|
it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "agricultural products."
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This concept is thoroughly grounded in Book I, Chapter 11, where Smith
|
|
extensively analyzes how demand for agricultural produce affects prices and consequently
|
|
land rents. The entity accurately reflects Smith's detailed examination of agricultural
|
|
markets and their dynamics.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since agricultural demand
|
|
fundamentally concerns market transactions between buyers and sellers of agricultural
|
|
goods. This is a core exchange mechanism that Smith analyzes in detail.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as
|
|
it represents market intelligence about demand patterns that agricultural producers
|
|
must adapt to. It also has some S1 relevance as it directly affects primary agricultural
|
|
operations.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the causal
|
|
mechanism linking market demand to agricultural prices and land rents. It captures
|
|
a key structural relationship in Smith's analysis of how agricultural markets
|
|
function and affect resource allocation.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Agricultural Demand
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes agricultural demand as market demand specifically for agricultural products, with clear causal links to prices and rents. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "agricultural products."
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This concept is thoroughly grounded in Book I, Chapter 11, where Smith extensively analyzes how demand for agricultural produce affects prices and consequently land rents. The entity accurately reflects Smith's detailed examination of agricultural markets and their dynamics.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since agricultural demand fundamentally concerns market transactions between buyers and sellers of agricultural goods. This is a core exchange mechanism that Smith analyzes in detail.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents market intelligence about demand patterns that agricultural producers must adapt to. It also has some S1 relevance as it directly affects primary agricultural operations.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the causal mechanism linking market demand to agricultural prices and land rents. It captures a key structural relationship in Smith's analysis of how agricultural markets function and affect resource allocation.
|