Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/agricultural_surplus.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

65 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: agricultural_surplus
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:32:03.090020'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing agricultural surplus
as the specific excess beyond maintenance costs for farmers, laborers, and livestock.
It avoids circularity and establishes concrete boundaries for what constitutes
this surplus.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter
11, where he explicitly discusses how rent derives from the surplus produce of
land after necessary cultivation costs. The entity accurately reflects Smith's
theoretical framework without introducing foreign concepts.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"Production" is the correct domain assignment, as agricultural surplus
is fundamentally about the productive capacity of land and the output that exceeds
input requirements. This fits naturally within production economics rather than
exchange or distribution domains.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: Agricultural surplus maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations)
as it represents the fundamental productive output of the agricultural system.
However, it also has elements relevant to S3 (resource allocation) and S4 (environmental
adaptation), making its VSM placement somewhat diffuse.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the
fundamental mechanism underlying rent theory and the basis for non-agricultural
economic activity. It reveals the structural relationship between agricultural
productivity and broader economic organization in Smith's framework.
---
# Evaluation: Agricultural Surplus
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing agricultural surplus as the specific excess beyond maintenance costs for farmers, laborers, and livestock. It avoids circularity and establishes concrete boundaries for what constitutes this surplus.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter 11, where he explicitly discusses how rent derives from the surplus produce of land after necessary cultivation costs. The entity accurately reflects Smith's theoretical framework without introducing foreign concepts.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"Production" is the correct domain assignment, as agricultural surplus is fundamentally about the productive capacity of land and the output that exceeds input requirements. This fits naturally within production economics rather than exchange or distribution domains.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
Agricultural surplus maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as it represents the fundamental productive output of the agricultural system. However, it also has elements relevant to S3 (resource allocation) and S4 (environmental adaptation), making its VSM placement somewhat diffuse.
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism underlying rent theory and the basis for non-agricultural economic activity. It reveals the structural relationship between agricultural productivity and broader economic organization in Smith's framework.