Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.9 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

agricultural_technology

null

2026-02-23T00:32:29.674078

4.6

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes agricultural technology as specific tools, techniques, and methods used in farming, with concrete examples like implements and cultivation practices. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept, though it could be slightly more precise about the boundary between technology and general agricultural knowledge.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book I, Chapter 11, where he extensively discusses agricultural improvements, their effects on productivity, and how technological adoption responds to market incentives. The concept directly reflects Smith's examination of agricultural progress and its economic implications.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Production" domain assignment is exactly correct, as agricultural technology is fundamentally about the methods and tools that determine how agricultural production occurs. This is a core production concept rather than belonging to exchange, distribution, or consumption domains.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	Agricultural technology maps naturally to S1 (primary operations) as the actual productive capacity, and to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) regarding how new technologies are developed and adopted in response to environmental and market changes. This dual mapping reflects genuine VSM relevance rather than being too abstract to place.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism through which agricultural productivity increases and how technological adoption creates feedback loops with rents and market incentives. It captures a fundamental driver of economic change rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

Evaluation: Agricultural Technology

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes agricultural technology as specific tools, techniques, and methods used in farming, with concrete examples like implements and cultivation practices. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept, though it could be slightly more precise about the boundary between technology and general agricultural knowledge.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book I, Chapter 11, where he extensively discusses agricultural improvements, their effects on productivity, and how technological adoption responds to market incentives. The concept directly reflects Smith's examination of agricultural progress and its economic implications.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Production" domain assignment is exactly correct, as agricultural technology is fundamentally about the methods and tools that determine how agricultural production occurs. This is a core production concept rather than belonging to exchange, distribution, or consumption domains.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

Agricultural technology maps naturally to S1 (primary operations) as the actual productive capacity, and to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) regarding how new technologies are developed and adopted in response to environmental and market changes. This dual mapping reflects genuine VSM relevance rather than being too abstract to place.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism through which agricultural productivity increases and how technological adoption creates feedback loops with rents and market incentives. It captures a fundamental driver of economic change rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

3.9 KiB Raw Blame History