tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
68 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
68 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: agricultural_technology
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:32:29.674078'
|
|
overall_score: 4.6
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes agricultural technology as specific
|
|
tools, techniques, and methods used in farming, with concrete examples like implements
|
|
and cultivation practices. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept,
|
|
though it could be slightly more precise about the boundary between technology
|
|
and general agricultural knowledge.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book I, Chapter
|
|
11, where he extensively discusses agricultural improvements, their effects on
|
|
productivity, and how technological adoption responds to market incentives. The
|
|
concept directly reflects Smith's examination of agricultural progress and its
|
|
economic implications.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Production" domain assignment is exactly correct, as agricultural
|
|
technology is fundamentally about the methods and tools that determine how agricultural
|
|
production occurs. This is a core production concept rather than belonging to
|
|
exchange, distribution, or consumption domains.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Agricultural technology maps naturally to S1 (primary operations) as
|
|
the actual productive capacity, and to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) regarding
|
|
how new technologies are developed and adopted in response to environmental and
|
|
market changes. This dual mapping reflects genuine VSM relevance rather than being
|
|
too abstract to place.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism
|
|
through which agricultural productivity increases and how technological adoption
|
|
creates feedback loops with rents and market incentives. It captures a fundamental
|
|
driver of economic change rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Agricultural Technology
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes agricultural technology as specific tools, techniques, and methods used in farming, with concrete examples like implements and cultivation practices. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept, though it could be slightly more precise about the boundary between technology and general agricultural knowledge.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book I, Chapter 11, where he extensively discusses agricultural improvements, their effects on productivity, and how technological adoption responds to market incentives. The concept directly reflects Smith's examination of agricultural progress and its economic implications.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Production" domain assignment is exactly correct, as agricultural technology is fundamentally about the methods and tools that determine how agricultural production occurs. This is a core production concept rather than belonging to exchange, distribution, or consumption domains.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Agricultural technology maps naturally to S1 (primary operations) as the actual productive capacity, and to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) regarding how new technologies are developed and adopted in response to environmental and market changes. This dual mapping reflects genuine VSM relevance rather than being too abstract to place.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides strong explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism through which agricultural productivity increases and how technological adoption creates feedback loops with rents and market incentives. It captures a fundamental driver of economic change rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|