tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: capital_accumulation
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:40:09.114804'
|
|
overall_score: 4.4
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes capital accumulation as the specific
|
|
process of converting savings into productive capital stock, with precise mechanisms
|
|
(parsimony, employment of productive labor, lending). It avoids circularity by
|
|
grounding the concept in the behavioral choice between consumption and saving.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Book II, Chapter 3's central argument
|
|
about parsimony as the immediate cause of capital increase. The definition accurately
|
|
reflects Smith's specific claims about how individual saving behavior creates
|
|
"a perpetual fund for maintaining productive labour."
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Accumulation" domain is precisely correct, as this entity describes
|
|
the fundamental process by which capital stock grows over time. This is distinct
|
|
from production, exchange, or distribution domains and represents a core economic
|
|
mechanism.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Capital accumulation maps most naturally to S4 (intelligence/adaptation)
|
|
as it represents how an economic system builds capacity for future operations,
|
|
though it also touches S1 (operations) through productive labor employment. The
|
|
mapping is reasonable but not as direct as operational concepts.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: "This entity illuminates a crucial structural mechanism in Smith's theory\u2014\
|
|
how individual behavioral choices (parsimony vs. consumption) aggregate into national\
|
|
\ economic outcomes. It explains the dynamic process underlying economic growth\
|
|
\ rather than merely naming a static phenomenon."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Capital Accumulation
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes capital accumulation as the specific process of converting savings into productive capital stock, with precise mechanisms (parsimony, employment of productive labor, lending). It avoids circularity by grounding the concept in the behavioral choice between consumption and saving.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Book II, Chapter 3's central argument about parsimony as the immediate cause of capital increase. The definition accurately reflects Smith's specific claims about how individual saving behavior creates "a perpetual fund for maintaining productive labour."
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Accumulation" domain is precisely correct, as this entity describes the fundamental process by which capital stock grows over time. This is distinct from production, exchange, or distribution domains and represents a core economic mechanism.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Capital accumulation maps most naturally to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as it represents how an economic system builds capacity for future operations, though it also touches S1 (operations) through productive labor employment. The mapping is reasonable but not as direct as operational concepts.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates a crucial structural mechanism in Smith's theory—how individual behavioral choices (parsimony vs. consumption) aggregate into national economic outcomes. It explains the dynamic process underlying economic growth rather than merely naming a static phenomenon.
|