tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: colonial_economic
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:49:13.410679'
|
|
overall_score: 1.8
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely
|
|
imprecise. "Colonial Economic" appears to be an incomplete phrase that could refer
|
|
to colonial economic systems, policies, or relationships, but without definition
|
|
it captures nothing distinct.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: While Smith does discuss colonial trade and economic relationships in
|
|
"The Wealth of Nations," this entity lacks any specified source chapter or context
|
|
to demonstrate actual grounding in the text. The incomplete phrasing suggests
|
|
it may not reflect Smith's actual terminology or conceptual framework.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: If this refers to colonial economic matters, it would reasonably belong
|
|
in an economic domain, but the unspecified domain and incomplete entity name make
|
|
proper categorization impossible. The economic nature is plausible but unconfirmed.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Colonial economic relationships could potentially map to S4 (environmental
|
|
intelligence about distant markets) or S1 (operational trade activities), but
|
|
the undefined nature of this entity makes VSM placement speculative at best. The
|
|
incomplete concept provides no clear systemic function.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: An undefined, incomplete entity provides zero explanatory value about
|
|
economic mechanisms or structural relations. It merely presents an incomplete
|
|
label without illuminating any aspect of Smith's analysis of colonial economic
|
|
dynamics.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Colonial Economic
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely imprecise. "Colonial Economic" appears to be an incomplete phrase that could refer to colonial economic systems, policies, or relationships, but without definition it captures nothing distinct.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
While Smith does discuss colonial trade and economic relationships in "The Wealth of Nations," this entity lacks any specified source chapter or context to demonstrate actual grounding in the text. The incomplete phrasing suggests it may not reflect Smith's actual terminology or conceptual framework.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
If this refers to colonial economic matters, it would reasonably belong in an economic domain, but the unspecified domain and incomplete entity name make proper categorization impossible. The economic nature is plausible but unconfirmed.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Colonial economic relationships could potentially map to S4 (environmental intelligence about distant markets) or S1 (operational trade activities), but the undefined nature of this entity makes VSM placement speculative at best. The incomplete concept provides no clear systemic function.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
An undefined, incomplete entity provides zero explanatory value about economic mechanisms or structural relations. It merely presents an incomplete label without illuminating any aspect of Smith's analysis of colonial economic dynamics.
|