tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
62 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
62 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: drawback
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:07:48.137058'
|
|
overall_score: 4.6
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing
|
|
drawbacks as refunds of previously paid duties upon re-export. It captures a distinct
|
|
fiscal mechanism rather than a vague concept.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book IV, Chapter
|
|
5, where he explicitly discusses drawbacks and their distinction from bounties.
|
|
The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of this specific trade policy
|
|
instrument.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as drawbacks
|
|
are a specific regulatory mechanism governing trade duties and customs. This fits
|
|
squarely within Smith's analysis of commercial policy and government intervention.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as a control mechanism
|
|
managing duty flows, and potentially S2 (coordination) for managing trade oscillations.
|
|
It represents a concrete regulatory instrument rather than an abstract concept.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's analysis of
|
|
trade policy, showing how governments can encourage re-export without providing
|
|
net subsidies. It reveals the structural logic behind a specific form of commercial
|
|
regulation that differs meaningfully from bounties.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Drawback
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing drawbacks as refunds of previously paid duties upon re-export. It captures a distinct fiscal mechanism rather than a vague concept.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book IV, Chapter 5, where he explicitly discusses drawbacks and their distinction from bounties. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of this specific trade policy instrument.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as drawbacks are a specific regulatory mechanism governing trade duties and customs. This fits squarely within Smith's analysis of commercial policy and government intervention.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as a control mechanism managing duty flows, and potentially S2 (coordination) for managing trade oscillations. It represents a concrete regulatory instrument rather than an abstract concept.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's analysis of trade policy, showing how governments can encourage re-export without providing net subsidies. It reveals the structural logic behind a specific form of commercial regulation that differs meaningfully from bounties.
|