Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_autonomy.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

66 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: economic_autonomy
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:09:15.119171'
overall_score: 1.8
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 1.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely
imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether
the concept captures something distinct or is merely a vague umbrella term.
- name: source_grounding
value: 2.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: While "economic autonomy" could relate to Smith's discussions of individual
economic freedom and self-interest, without a definition or specified source chapter,
there's no way to verify this entity is grounded in actual textual content. The
term itself is plausible but unsubstantiated.
- name: domain_placement
value: 2.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The domain is listed as "unspecified," which is problematic for an economic
concept that should clearly belong to a particular thematic category. Economic
autonomy could reasonably fit in domains related to individual liberty, market
mechanisms, or institutional frameworks, but without specification it's poorly
placed.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: Economic autonomy could potentially map to multiple VSM systems - S1
(autonomous operational units), S4 (adaptive capacity), or S5 (identity/policy
autonomy) - but without a clear definition, the VSM placement remains speculative.
The concept has potential VSM relevance but lacks the precision needed for confident
mapping.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 1.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: Without any definition, context, or source grounding, this entity provides
no explanatory power whatsoever. It's merely a label that could refer to various
economic phenomena but illuminates no specific mechanisms or structural relations
from Smith's work.
---
# Evaluation: Economic Autonomy
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether the concept captures something distinct or is merely a vague umbrella term.
## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
While "economic autonomy" could relate to Smith's discussions of individual economic freedom and self-interest, without a definition or specified source chapter, there's no way to verify this entity is grounded in actual textual content. The term itself is plausible but unsubstantiated.
## domain_placement — 2.0 / 5.0
The domain is listed as "unspecified," which is problematic for an economic concept that should clearly belong to a particular thematic category. Economic autonomy could reasonably fit in domains related to individual liberty, market mechanisms, or institutional frameworks, but without specification it's poorly placed.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
Economic autonomy could potentially map to multiple VSM systems - S1 (autonomous operational units), S4 (adaptive capacity), or S5 (identity/policy autonomy) - but without a clear definition, the VSM placement remains speculative. The concept has potential VSM relevance but lacks the precision needed for confident mapping.
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
Without any definition, context, or source grounding, this entity provides no explanatory power whatsoever. It's merely a label that could refer to various economic phenomena but illuminates no specific mechanisms or structural relations from Smith's work.