tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
63 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: economic_identity
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:10:55.402845'
|
|
overall_score: 1.6
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely
|
|
imprecise. Without any definition, it's impossible to determine what "Economic
|
|
Identity" specifically refers to or how it differs from related concepts.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: With no source chapter specified and no definition or context provided,
|
|
there's no evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. "Economic
|
|
Identity" appears to be a modern analytical construct rather than a concept Smith
|
|
explicitly discussed.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: While "Economic Identity" sounds like it should belong in an economic
|
|
domain, without a definition it's unclear whether this is correctly categorized.
|
|
The concept could potentially span multiple domains depending on what it actually
|
|
refers to.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The term "identity" suggests a natural connection to VSM System 5 (identity/policy),
|
|
which deals with organizational identity and purpose. However, without a clear
|
|
definition, it's impossible to confirm this mapping or rule out connections to
|
|
other systems.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: An undefined entity provides zero explanatory value and cannot illuminate
|
|
any mechanisms or structural relations. This appears to be an empty placeholder
|
|
that adds no analytical insight to understanding Smith's work.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Economic Identity
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely imprecise. Without any definition, it's impossible to determine what "Economic Identity" specifically refers to or how it differs from related concepts.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
With no source chapter specified and no definition or context provided, there's no evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. "Economic Identity" appears to be a modern analytical construct rather than a concept Smith explicitly discussed.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
While "Economic Identity" sounds like it should belong in an economic domain, without a definition it's unclear whether this is correctly categorized. The concept could potentially span multiple domains depending on what it actually refers to.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The term "identity" suggests a natural connection to VSM System 5 (identity/policy), which deals with organizational identity and purpose. However, without a clear definition, it's impossible to confirm this mapping or rule out connections to other systems.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
An undefined entity provides zero explanatory value and cannot illuminate any mechanisms or structural relations. This appears to be an empty placeholder that adds no analytical insight to understanding Smith's work.
|