tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: enumerated_commodities
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:23:36.157100'
|
|
overall_score: 4.8
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is highly precise, clearly identifying specific colonial
|
|
products (tobacco, sugar, cotton, indigo, naval stores) and their exact regulatory
|
|
constraint (exportable only to the mother country). It captures a distinct legal-economic
|
|
category rather than a vague concept.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's detailed analysis of the
|
|
Navigation Acts in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he extensively discusses these specific
|
|
commodity restrictions. The concept emerges clearly from Smith's critique of mercantilist
|
|
colonial policy.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as enumerated
|
|
commodities represent a specific regulatory mechanism within the broader mercantilist
|
|
system. This is fundamentally about trade restrictions and legal constraints on
|
|
commerce.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a
|
|
control mechanism within the imperial economic system, and partially to S2 (coordination)
|
|
as it channels colonial trade flows. The regulatory nature gives it clear VSM
|
|
relevance.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the
|
|
specific mechanism through which mercantilist policy constrained colonial autonomy
|
|
and market efficiency. It reveals how regulatory categories created artificial
|
|
monopolies and distorted natural trade patterns.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Enumerated Commodities
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is highly precise, clearly identifying specific colonial products (tobacco, sugar, cotton, indigo, naval stores) and their exact regulatory constraint (exportable only to the mother country). It captures a distinct legal-economic category rather than a vague concept.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's detailed analysis of the Navigation Acts in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he extensively discusses these specific commodity restrictions. The concept emerges clearly from Smith's critique of mercantilist colonial policy.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as enumerated commodities represent a specific regulatory mechanism within the broader mercantilist system. This is fundamentally about trade restrictions and legal constraints on commerce.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a control mechanism within the imperial economic system, and partially to S2 (coordination) as it channels colonial trade flows. The regulatory nature gives it clear VSM relevance.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the specific mechanism through which mercantilist policy constrained colonial autonomy and market efficiency. It reveals how regulatory categories created artificial monopolies and distorted natural trade patterns.
|