tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: favour
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:27:58.544624'
|
|
overall_score: 4.0
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes favour from contractual exchange
|
|
and market transactions, establishing it as benefits granted through goodwill
|
|
rather than obligation. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept
|
|
that Smith uses to contrast with market mechanisms.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
|
|
2, where he explicitly discusses how animals gain favour and contrasts this with
|
|
human economic organization. The definition accurately reflects Smith's argument
|
|
about favour's limitations in complex societies.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Placement in the "Exchange" domain is highly appropriate since Smith
|
|
uses favour specifically to contrast with market exchange mechanisms. The concept
|
|
is fundamentally about alternative modes of obtaining goods and services.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Favour is more of a pre-systemic or anti-systemic concept that represents
|
|
what economic organization moves away from rather than a component of viable economic
|
|
systems. It doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system since it represents
|
|
the absence of systematic coordination.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The concept provides significant explanatory value by illuminating why
|
|
market mechanisms emerge as superior to personal relationships for complex economic
|
|
coordination. It helps explain the structural necessity of impersonal exchange
|
|
systems in advanced societies.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Favour
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes favour from contractual exchange and market transactions, establishing it as benefits granted through goodwill rather than obligation. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept that Smith uses to contrast with market mechanisms.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses how animals gain favour and contrasts this with human economic organization. The definition accurately reflects Smith's argument about favour's limitations in complex societies.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Placement in the "Exchange" domain is highly appropriate since Smith uses favour specifically to contrast with market exchange mechanisms. The concept is fundamentally about alternative modes of obtaining goods and services.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Favour is more of a pre-systemic or anti-systemic concept that represents what economic organization moves away from rather than a component of viable economic systems. It doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system since it represents the absence of systematic coordination.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The concept provides significant explanatory value by illuminating why market mechanisms emerge as superior to personal relationships for complex economic coordination. It helps explain the structural necessity of impersonal exchange systems in advanced societies.
|