tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: funded_debt
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:32:35.532124'
|
|
overall_score: 4.4
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes funded debt from other forms of
|
|
government borrowing by specifying that it involves dedicated revenue streams
|
|
or taxes assigned for repayment. This creates a precise conceptual boundary, though
|
|
it could be slightly more specific about the institutional mechanisms involved.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book V, Chapter
|
|
3, where he explicitly analyzes funded debt as a distinct stage in government
|
|
borrowing practices. The entity accurately reflects Smith's own terminology and
|
|
analytical framework.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain placement is highly appropriate, as funded debt
|
|
represents a specific regulatory and institutional mechanism for managing government
|
|
finances and public credit. This fits squarely within Smith's analysis of governmental
|
|
financial administration.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
|
|
a control mechanism for managing government financial obligations, and potentially
|
|
to S2 (coordination) as it coordinates revenue streams with debt obligations.
|
|
The institutional nature makes it naturally VSM-relevant.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The concept illuminates an important structural mechanism in public finance,
|
|
explaining how governments can credibly commit to debt repayment through institutional
|
|
arrangements. It reveals the evolution from ad hoc borrowing to systematic debt
|
|
management, providing genuine insight into fiscal governance.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Funded Debt
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes funded debt from other forms of government borrowing by specifying that it involves dedicated revenue streams or taxes assigned for repayment. This creates a precise conceptual boundary, though it could be slightly more specific about the institutional mechanisms involved.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly analyzes funded debt as a distinct stage in government borrowing practices. The entity accurately reflects Smith's own terminology and analytical framework.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain placement is highly appropriate, as funded debt represents a specific regulatory and institutional mechanism for managing government finances and public credit. This fits squarely within Smith's analysis of governmental financial administration.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a control mechanism for managing government financial obligations, and potentially to S2 (coordination) as it coordinates revenue streams with debt obligations. The institutional nature makes it naturally VSM-relevant.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The concept illuminates an important structural mechanism in public finance, explaining how governments can credibly commit to debt repayment through institutional arrangements. It reveals the evolution from ad hoc borrowing to systematic debt management, providing genuine insight into fiscal governance.
|