Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

inclosure

null

2026-02-23T05:36:39.212759

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly describes inclosure as a specific agricultural practice involving physical boundaries to create defined units. It identifies concrete benefits (livestock control, intensive cultivation, crop protection) rather than vague generalities.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 11, where he explicitly discusses inclosure's effects on land productivity and rents. The context accurately reflects Smith's analysis of Scottish inclosed land and temporary scarcity effects.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	Placement in the "Production" domain is entirely appropriate since inclosure is fundamentally about organizing land as a factor of production. It directly relates to agricultural productivity and land use efficiency.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	Inclosure maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as it represents a fundamental operational practice in agricultural production. However, it's primarily a static structural arrangement rather than a dynamic system component.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity illuminates an important mechanism by which agricultural productivity increases through better resource control and protection. It explains the structural relationship between land organization, productivity, and rent formation in Smith's economic framework.

Evaluation: Inclosure

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly describes inclosure as a specific agricultural practice involving physical boundaries to create defined units. It identifies concrete benefits (livestock control, intensive cultivation, crop protection) rather than vague generalities.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 11, where he explicitly discusses inclosure's effects on land productivity and rents. The context accurately reflects Smith's analysis of Scottish inclosed land and temporary scarcity effects.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

Placement in the "Production" domain is entirely appropriate since inclosure is fundamentally about organizing land as a factor of production. It directly relates to agricultural productivity and land use efficiency.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

Inclosure maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as it represents a fundamental operational practice in agricultural production. However, it's primarily a static structural arrangement rather than a dynamic system component.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity illuminates an important mechanism by which agricultural productivity increases through better resource control and protection. It explains the structural relationship between land organization, productivity, and rent formation in Smith's economic framework.

3.1 KiB Raw Blame History