tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
63 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: inclosure
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:36:39.212759'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly describes inclosure as a specific agricultural
|
|
practice involving physical boundaries to create defined units. It identifies
|
|
concrete benefits (livestock control, intensive cultivation, crop protection)
|
|
rather than vague generalities.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
|
|
11, where he explicitly discusses inclosure's effects on land productivity and
|
|
rents. The context accurately reflects Smith's analysis of Scottish inclosed land
|
|
and temporary scarcity effects.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Placement in the "Production" domain is entirely appropriate since inclosure
|
|
is fundamentally about organizing land as a factor of production. It directly
|
|
relates to agricultural productivity and land use efficiency.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Inclosure maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as it represents
|
|
a fundamental operational practice in agricultural production. However, it's primarily
|
|
a static structural arrangement rather than a dynamic system component.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The entity illuminates an important mechanism by which agricultural productivity
|
|
increases through better resource control and protection. It explains the structural
|
|
relationship between land organization, productivity, and rent formation in Smith's
|
|
economic framework.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Inclosure
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly describes inclosure as a specific agricultural practice involving physical boundaries to create defined units. It identifies concrete benefits (livestock control, intensive cultivation, crop protection) rather than vague generalities.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 11, where he explicitly discusses inclosure's effects on land productivity and rents. The context accurately reflects Smith's analysis of Scottish inclosed land and temporary scarcity effects.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Placement in the "Production" domain is entirely appropriate since inclosure is fundamentally about organizing land as a factor of production. It directly relates to agricultural productivity and land use efficiency.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Inclosure maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as it represents a fundamental operational practice in agricultural production. However, it's primarily a static structural arrangement rather than a dynamic system component.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The entity illuminates an important mechanism by which agricultural productivity increases through better resource control and protection. It explains the structural relationship between land organization, productivity, and rent formation in Smith's economic framework.
|