tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
66 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: land_carriage
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:39:56.715339'
|
|
overall_score: 4.4
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes land-carriage from water-carriage
|
|
and specifies the key components (waggons, carts, pack animals) and economic characteristics
|
|
(higher costs, limited market extent). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct
|
|
transportation mode with specific economic implications.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
|
|
3, where he explicitly discusses land-carriage and provides the specific calculations
|
|
mentioned (hundred men for three weeks, four hundred horses for two hundred tons).
|
|
The economic analysis of its limitations on market extent is central to Smith's
|
|
argument.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Exchange" domain placement is correct, as land-carriage is fundamentally
|
|
about the mechanisms and costs of moving goods between markets. Smith uses it
|
|
specifically to explain how transportation costs affect the extent of markets
|
|
and the feasibility of trade.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Land-carriage maps most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as a basic
|
|
operational capability for moving goods, but it also has S4 implications regarding
|
|
environmental adaptation to geographic constraints. However, it's primarily an
|
|
operational tool rather than a systemic function.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the
|
|
structural mechanism through which transportation costs limit market extent and
|
|
division of labour. It's not merely descriptive but reveals a fundamental economic
|
|
constraint that shapes market development and specialization possibilities.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Land Carriage
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes land-carriage from water-carriage and specifies the key components (waggons, carts, pack animals) and economic characteristics (higher costs, limited market extent). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct transportation mode with specific economic implications.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses land-carriage and provides the specific calculations mentioned (hundred men for three weeks, four hundred horses for two hundred tons). The economic analysis of its limitations on market extent is central to Smith's argument.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Exchange" domain placement is correct, as land-carriage is fundamentally about the mechanisms and costs of moving goods between markets. Smith uses it specifically to explain how transportation costs affect the extent of markets and the feasibility of trade.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Land-carriage maps most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as a basic operational capability for moving goods, but it also has S4 implications regarding environmental adaptation to geographic constraints. However, it's primarily an operational tool rather than a systemic function.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism through which transportation costs limit market extent and division of labour. It's not merely descriptive but reveals a fundamental economic constraint that shapes market development and specialization possibilities.
|