Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.2 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

legal_tender

null

2026-02-23T05:41:08.983598

4.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing legal tender as legally recognized payment that creditors must accept for debt discharge. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct legal-economic concept rather than being vague.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	4.0	5.0	Smith does discuss how societies designate certain metals as acceptable forms of payment and examines the legal framework around money in Book I, Chapter 5. The concept aligns well with his analysis of monetary standards and legal recognition of payment forms.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since legal tender is fundamentally about legal rules and governmental designation of acceptable payment forms. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market or production concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	Legal tender maps most naturally to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents regulatory standards for monetary transactions within an economic system. However, it could also touch S5 (policy/identity) regarding what a society chooses to recognize as money.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	This entity illuminates an important structural mechanism - how legal frameworks create and maintain monetary systems by mandating acceptance of certain payment forms. It explains a key institutional foundation that enables monetary exchange to function systematically.

Evaluation: Legal Tender

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing legal tender as legally recognized payment that creditors must accept for debt discharge. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct legal-economic concept rather than being vague.

source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

Smith does discuss how societies designate certain metals as acceptable forms of payment and examines the legal framework around money in Book I, Chapter 5. The concept aligns well with his analysis of monetary standards and legal recognition of payment forms.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since legal tender is fundamentally about legal rules and governmental designation of acceptable payment forms. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market or production concept.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

Legal tender maps most naturally to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents regulatory standards for monetary transactions within an economic system. However, it could also touch S5 (policy/identity) regarding what a society chooses to recognize as money.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity illuminates an important structural mechanism - how legal frameworks create and maintain monetary systems by mandating acceptance of certain payment forms. It explains a key institutional foundation that enables monetary exchange to function systematically.

3.2 KiB Raw Blame History