tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
63 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: legal_tender
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:41:08.983598'
|
|
overall_score: 4.0
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing legal tender as legally
|
|
recognized payment that creditors must accept for debt discharge. It avoids circularity
|
|
and captures a distinct legal-economic concept rather than being vague.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Smith does discuss how societies designate certain metals as acceptable
|
|
forms of payment and examines the legal framework around money in Book I, Chapter
|
|
5. The concept aligns well with his analysis of monetary standards and legal recognition
|
|
of payment forms.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since legal tender is fundamentally
|
|
about legal rules and governmental designation of acceptable payment forms. This
|
|
is clearly a regulatory rather than market or production concept.'
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Legal tender maps most naturally to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents
|
|
regulatory standards for monetary transactions within an economic system. However,
|
|
it could also touch S5 (policy/identity) regarding what a society chooses to recognize
|
|
as money.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity illuminates an important structural mechanism - how legal
|
|
frameworks create and maintain monetary systems by mandating acceptance of certain
|
|
payment forms. It explains a key institutional foundation that enables monetary
|
|
exchange to function systematically.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Legal Tender
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is clear and precise, distinguishing legal tender as legally recognized payment that creditors must accept for debt discharge. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct legal-economic concept rather than being vague.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Smith does discuss how societies designate certain metals as acceptable forms of payment and examines the legal framework around money in Book I, Chapter 5. The concept aligns well with his analysis of monetary standards and legal recognition of payment forms.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since legal tender is fundamentally about legal rules and governmental designation of acceptable payment forms. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market or production concept.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Legal tender maps most naturally to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents regulatory standards for monetary transactions within an economic system. However, it could also touch S5 (policy/identity) regarding what a society chooses to recognize as money.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates an important structural mechanism - how legal frameworks create and maintain monetary systems by mandating acceptance of certain payment forms. It explains a key institutional foundation that enables monetary exchange to function systematically.
|