Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/mine_fertility.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

65 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: mine_fertility
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:53:02.260524'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes mine fertility as productivity per
unit of labor/capital, avoiding circularity and providing measurable criteria.
It could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "valuable material" but
otherwise captures a distinct economic concept.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter
11, where he explicitly discusses how the fertility of mines affects rent and
pricing. The entity accurately reflects Smith's comparative analysis between mineral
extraction and agricultural production.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"Production" is the correct domain placement as mine fertility directly
relates to the productive capacity and efficiency of extractive operations. This
fits naturally within Smith''s broader analysis of productive factors and their
economic effects.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: Mine fertility maps most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as it describes
the productive capacity of basic economic units, but it also has some relevance
to S4 (intelligence) regarding resource assessment. However, it's somewhat abstract
as a natural characteristic rather than an active system component.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating why mineral
rents differ from agricultural rents and how natural endowments affect market
structures. It reveals an important mechanism in Smith's theory of how natural
factors influence economic outcomes and pricing.
---
# Evaluation: Mine Fertility
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly distinguishes mine fertility as productivity per unit of labor/capital, avoiding circularity and providing measurable criteria. It could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "valuable material" but otherwise captures a distinct economic concept.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter 11, where he explicitly discusses how the fertility of mines affects rent and pricing. The entity accurately reflects Smith's comparative analysis between mineral extraction and agricultural production.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"Production" is the correct domain placement as mine fertility directly relates to the productive capacity and efficiency of extractive operations. This fits naturally within Smith's broader analysis of productive factors and their economic effects.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
Mine fertility maps most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as it describes the productive capacity of basic economic units, but it also has some relevance to S4 (intelligence) regarding resource assessment. However, it's somewhat abstract as a natural characteristic rather than an active system component.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating why mineral rents differ from agricultural rents and how natural endowments affect market structures. It reveals an important mechanism in Smith's theory of how natural factors influence economic outcomes and pricing.