Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

neat_produce

null

2026-02-23T06:01:44.061120

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition is precise and mathematically clear, specifying that neat produce equals gross produce minus all necessary expenses (cultivation, farmer costs, and ground expenses). This creates a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella term.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis of agricultural systems in Book IV, Chapter 9, where he explicitly discusses the distinction between gross and neat produce as fundamental to understanding national wealth. The terminology and conceptual framework are authentically Smithian.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Production" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as neat produce is fundamentally about the productive output of agricultural systems after accounting for all production costs. This is a core production-side economic concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a key performance metric for measuring system efficiency and true productive output. However, it's more of a measurement concept than an active system component.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the crucial mechanism Smith uses to distinguish between apparent and real wealth creation in agricultural systems. It's fundamental to understanding his critique of mercantilism and his theory of productive versus unproductive labor.

Evaluation: Neat Produce

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition is precise and mathematically clear, specifying that neat produce equals gross produce minus all necessary expenses (cultivation, farmer costs, and ground expenses). This creates a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella term.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis of agricultural systems in Book IV, Chapter 9, where he explicitly discusses the distinction between gross and neat produce as fundamental to understanding national wealth. The terminology and conceptual framework are authentically Smithian.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Production" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as neat produce is fundamentally about the productive output of agricultural systems after accounting for all production costs. This is a core production-side economic concept.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a key performance metric for measuring system efficiency and true productive output. However, it's more of a measurement concept than an active system component.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the crucial mechanism Smith uses to distinguish between apparent and real wealth creation in agricultural systems. It's fundamental to understanding his critique of mercantilism and his theory of productive versus unproductive labor.

3.4 KiB Raw Blame History