Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/neat_produce.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: neat_produce
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:01:44.061120'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition is precise and mathematically clear, specifying that neat
produce equals gross produce minus all necessary expenses (cultivation, farmer
costs, and ground expenses). This creates a distinct, measurable concept rather
than a vague umbrella term.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis of agricultural
systems in Book IV, Chapter 9, where he explicitly discusses the distinction between
gross and neat produce as fundamental to understanding national wealth. The terminology
and conceptual framework are authentically Smithian.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The "Production" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as neat
produce is fundamentally about the productive output of agricultural systems after
accounting for all production costs. This is a core production-side economic concept.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S3 (internal
regulation/audit) as it represents a key performance metric for measuring system
efficiency and true productive output. However, it's more of a measurement concept
than an active system component.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the
crucial mechanism Smith uses to distinguish between apparent and real wealth creation
in agricultural systems. It's fundamental to understanding his critique of mercantilism
and his theory of productive versus unproductive labor.
---
# Evaluation: Neat Produce
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition is precise and mathematically clear, specifying that neat produce equals gross produce minus all necessary expenses (cultivation, farmer costs, and ground expenses). This creates a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella term.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis of agricultural systems in Book IV, Chapter 9, where he explicitly discusses the distinction between gross and neat produce as fundamental to understanding national wealth. The terminology and conceptual framework are authentically Smithian.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
The "Production" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as neat produce is fundamentally about the productive output of agricultural systems after accounting for all production costs. This is a core production-side economic concept.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a key performance metric for measuring system efficiency and true productive output. However, it's more of a measurement concept than an active system component.
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the crucial mechanism Smith uses to distinguish between apparent and real wealth creation in agricultural systems. It's fundamental to understanding his critique of mercantilism and his theory of productive versus unproductive labor.