Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/neat_revenue.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: neat_revenue
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:01:52.086227'
overall_score: 4.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition is clear and precise, establishing neat revenue as the
remainder after deducting capital maintenance costs from annual produce. The analogy
to "neat rent" helps clarify the concept, though the term "free" could be slightly
more precise.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book II, Chapter
2, where he explicitly discusses the distinction between gross and neat revenue
and their relationship to societal wealth. The definition accurately reflects
Smith's original formulation.
- name: domain_placement
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"Distribution" is appropriate since neat revenue concerns how society''s
total output is allocated between capital maintenance and available consumption.
However, it could also fit in a "Capital" or "Wealth" domain given its focus on
what remains after capital expenses.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S3 (internal
regulation) as it represents a key performance metric for societal resource allocation.
However, it's more of an outcome measure than an active system component.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory value by distinguishing between
gross output and actual available wealth, illuminating the crucial mechanism of
how capital maintenance requirements affect societal prosperity. It reveals the
structural relationship between production, capital, and consumable wealth.
---
# Evaluation: Neat Revenue
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition is clear and precise, establishing neat revenue as the remainder after deducting capital maintenance costs from annual produce. The analogy to "neat rent" helps clarify the concept, though the term "free" could be slightly more precise.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book II, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses the distinction between gross and neat revenue and their relationship to societal wealth. The definition accurately reflects Smith's original formulation.
## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
"Distribution" is appropriate since neat revenue concerns how society's total output is allocated between capital maintenance and available consumption. However, it could also fit in a "Capital" or "Wealth" domain given its focus on what remains after capital expenses.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a key performance metric for societal resource allocation. However, it's more of an outcome measure than an active system component.
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides excellent explanatory value by distinguishing between gross output and actual available wealth, illuminating the crucial mechanism of how capital maintenance requirements affect societal prosperity. It reveals the structural relationship between production, capital, and consumable wealth.