Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/public_fiars.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

67 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: public_fiars
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:12:53.320746'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition is quite precise, clearly identifying public fiars as
official annual grain price valuations conducted by Scottish assize courts with
specific purposes (standardizing corn-to-money rent conversions). The only minor
imprecision is that it could better specify the exact legal authority and scope
of these valuations.
- name: source_grounding
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This appears well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion of Scottish grain
pricing mechanisms in Book I, Chapter 11, where he examines various attempts at
price regulation. Smith would likely have discussed such institutional arrangements
when analyzing agricultural markets and rent conversions in Scotland.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"Regulation" is the perfect domain placement for this entity, as public
fiars represent a clear example of government intervention in market pricing mechanisms.
This is precisely the type of regulatory institution Smith would analyze when
discussing state involvement in economic affairs.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: Public fiars map reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as
they represent systematic monitoring and standardization of prices within the
economic system. However, they also have elements of S2 (coordination) in standardizing
price information across markets, making the VSM placement somewhat ambiguous.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides good explanatory value by illuminating a specific
institutional mechanism for price regulation and market coordination that Smith
would use to analyze the effectiveness of government intervention versus market
forces. It represents a concrete example of how societies attempt to manage agricultural
market volatility through formal institutions.
---
# Evaluation: Public Fiars
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition is quite precise, clearly identifying public fiars as official annual grain price valuations conducted by Scottish assize courts with specific purposes (standardizing corn-to-money rent conversions). The only minor imprecision is that it could better specify the exact legal authority and scope of these valuations.
## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
This appears well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion of Scottish grain pricing mechanisms in Book I, Chapter 11, where he examines various attempts at price regulation. Smith would likely have discussed such institutional arrangements when analyzing agricultural markets and rent conversions in Scotland.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"Regulation" is the perfect domain placement for this entity, as public fiars represent a clear example of government intervention in market pricing mechanisms. This is precisely the type of regulatory institution Smith would analyze when discussing state involvement in economic affairs.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
Public fiars map reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as they represent systematic monitoring and standardization of prices within the economic system. However, they also have elements of S2 (coordination) in standardizing price information across markets, making the VSM placement somewhat ambiguous.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity provides good explanatory value by illuminating a specific institutional mechanism for price regulation and market coordination that Smith would use to analyze the effectiveness of government intervention versus market forces. It represents a concrete example of how societies attempt to manage agricultural market volatility through formal institutions.