tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
63 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: purveyance
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:14:48.403741'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is precise and captures a distinct feudal practice with
|
|
clear operational characteristics (requisitioning at regulated prices during specific
|
|
circumstances). It avoids circularity and distinguishes purveyance from general
|
|
taxation through its specific mechanism and context.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book III, Chapter
|
|
2, where he explicitly discusses purveyance as one of the arbitrary services imposed
|
|
on the yeomanry and notes its abolition as part of legal reforms in Great Britain.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate, as purveyance
|
|
represents a specific regulatory mechanism of feudal governance that constrained
|
|
economic activity through mandatory provision of goods and services.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Purveyance maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as a control
|
|
mechanism within the feudal system, though it also has S1 operational aspects
|
|
in terms of resource extraction. However, it's primarily a historical regulatory
|
|
practice rather than a core VSM concept.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illustrating a specific
|
|
mechanism through which feudal systems extracted resources and burdened economic
|
|
actors, helping explain the structural constraints on economic development that
|
|
Smith analyzes.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Purveyance
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is precise and captures a distinct feudal practice with clear operational characteristics (requisitioning at regulated prices during specific circumstances). It avoids circularity and distinguishes purveyance from general taxation through its specific mechanism and context.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses purveyance as one of the arbitrary services imposed on the yeomanry and notes its abolition as part of legal reforms in Great Britain.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate, as purveyance represents a specific regulatory mechanism of feudal governance that constrained economic activity through mandatory provision of goods and services.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Purveyance maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as a control mechanism within the feudal system, though it also has S1 operational aspects in terms of resource extraction. However, it's primarily a historical regulatory practice rather than a core VSM concept.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illustrating a specific mechanism through which feudal systems extracted resources and burdened economic actors, helping explain the structural constraints on economic development that Smith analyzes.
|