Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/sinking_fund.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

65 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: sinking_fund
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:21:37.078342'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition is clear and specific, identifying a sinking fund as a
dedicated mechanism for debt reduction with particular funding sources and accumulation
purpose. It avoids circularity and captures the distinct financial instrument
Smith discusses.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book V, Chapter
3, where he explicitly discusses sinking funds as debt reduction mechanisms and
notes their tendency to be diverted to other purposes. The definition accurately
reflects Smith's treatment of the concept.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since sinking funds represent
a governmental regulatory mechanism for managing public debt and fiscal policy.
This fits well within the broader regulatory framework Smith discusses for public
finance.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
a systematic mechanism for monitoring and controlling debt levels within the government
system. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence) in terms of long-term financial
planning.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in public finance
that Smith identifies as theoretically sound but practically problematic due to
political pressures. It reveals the tension between designed financial controls
and actual governmental behavior.
---
# Evaluation: Sinking Fund
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition is clear and specific, identifying a sinking fund as a dedicated mechanism for debt reduction with particular funding sources and accumulation purpose. It avoids circularity and captures the distinct financial instrument Smith discusses.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book V, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses sinking funds as debt reduction mechanisms and notes their tendency to be diverted to other purposes. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of the concept.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since sinking funds represent a governmental regulatory mechanism for managing public debt and fiscal policy. This fits well within the broader regulatory framework Smith discusses for public finance.
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a systematic mechanism for monitoring and controlling debt levels within the government system. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence) in terms of long-term financial planning.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in public finance that Smith identifies as theoretically sound but practically problematic due to political pressures. It reveals the tension between designed financial controls and actual governmental behavior.