tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: stock
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:26:27.937016'
|
|
overall_score: 4.4
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes stock from consumption goods and
|
|
establishes the key division between capital-generating and revenue-supporting
|
|
stock. While precise in its core distinction, it could be slightly more specific
|
|
about what constitutes "accumulated wealth."
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This concept is directly and extensively grounded in Book II, Chapter
|
|
1 of The Wealth of Nations, where Smith explicitly introduces the distinction
|
|
between stock and consumption, and between different types of stock. The definition
|
|
accurately reflects Smith's foundational framework.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this concept
|
|
establishes fundamental theoretical distinctions that underpin Smith''s entire
|
|
analysis of capital and economic growth. It serves as a foundational building
|
|
block for more specific economic mechanisms.'
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Stock has some relevance to multiple VSM systems (S1 as operational resources,
|
|
S3 as internal assets to be managed, S4 as adaptive capacity), but it's primarily
|
|
a static resource concept rather than a dynamic system function. It's more of
|
|
an input to VSM systems than a system itself.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides crucial explanatory power by establishing the fundamental
|
|
distinction between wealth used for immediate consumption versus wealth employed
|
|
to generate future revenue. It illuminates the structural foundation of capital
|
|
accumulation and economic growth mechanisms.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Stock
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes stock from consumption goods and establishes the key division between capital-generating and revenue-supporting stock. While precise in its core distinction, it could be slightly more specific about what constitutes "accumulated wealth."
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This concept is directly and extensively grounded in Book II, Chapter 1 of The Wealth of Nations, where Smith explicitly introduces the distinction between stock and consumption, and between different types of stock. The definition accurately reflects Smith's foundational framework.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this concept establishes fundamental theoretical distinctions that underpin Smith's entire analysis of capital and economic growth. It serves as a foundational building block for more specific economic mechanisms.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Stock has some relevance to multiple VSM systems (S1 as operational resources, S3 as internal assets to be managed, S4 as adaptive capacity), but it's primarily a static resource concept rather than a dynamic system function. It's more of an input to VSM systems than a system itself.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides crucial explanatory power by establishing the fundamental distinction between wealth used for immediate consumption versus wealth employed to generate future revenue. It illuminates the structural foundation of capital accumulation and economic growth mechanisms.
|