tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
62 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
62 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: systemic_stability
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:28:48.958997'
|
|
overall_score: 1.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely
|
|
imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether
|
|
the concept is distinct or merely a vague umbrella term.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: With no definition, context, or source chapter specified, there's no
|
|
evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The term "systemic stability"
|
|
appears to be a modern analytical overlay rather than a concept Smith explicitly
|
|
discussed.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The domain is listed as "unspecified," indicating no clear economic or
|
|
thematic categorization has been established. Without definition or context, proper
|
|
domain placement is impossible to assess or correct.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: While "systemic stability" could theoretically relate to VSM concepts
|
|
(particularly S2's anti-oscillation function or S3's regulatory role), the complete
|
|
lack of definition makes any VSM mapping purely speculative. The term is too abstract
|
|
and undefined to meaningfully place within the VSM framework.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: An undefined entity provides zero explanatory power and illuminates no
|
|
mechanisms or structural relations. Without content, it cannot distinguish between
|
|
genuine systemic mechanisms and surface-level naming of phenomena.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Systemic Stability
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
There is no definition provided at all, making this entity completely imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether the concept is distinct or merely a vague umbrella term.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
With no definition, context, or source chapter specified, there's no evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The term "systemic stability" appears to be a modern analytical overlay rather than a concept Smith explicitly discussed.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The domain is listed as "unspecified," indicating no clear economic or thematic categorization has been established. Without definition or context, proper domain placement is impossible to assess or correct.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
While "systemic stability" could theoretically relate to VSM concepts (particularly S2's anti-oscillation function or S3's regulatory role), the complete lack of definition makes any VSM mapping purely speculative. The term is too abstract and undefined to meaningfully place within the VSM framework.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
An undefined entity provides zero explanatory power and illuminates no mechanisms or structural relations. Without content, it cannot distinguish between genuine systemic mechanisms and surface-level naming of phenomena.
|