tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
68 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
68 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: trade_capital
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:33:07.372034'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes trade capital from other forms of
|
|
capital by its function in exchange and distribution, and specifies its role in
|
|
connecting surplus with demand. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct
|
|
economic concept, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes
|
|
"capital employed" in this context.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book II, Chapter
|
|
5, where he explicitly discusses trade capital and its subdivisions (home trade,
|
|
foreign trade, carrying trade). The characterization of trade capital as "least
|
|
productive" in terms of productive labour is faithful to Smith's actual argument.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate for trade capital, as
|
|
this concept is fundamentally about the mechanisms and processes of exchanging
|
|
goods between producers and consumers. This is clearly distinct from production,
|
|
consumption, or other economic domains.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Trade capital has some VSM relevance as it relates to coordination (S2)
|
|
by connecting different parts of the economy, and potentially to intelligence
|
|
(S4) through market information flows. However, it doesn't map cleanly to any
|
|
single VSM system and remains somewhat abstract relative to operational cybernetic
|
|
functions.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating how capital
|
|
allocation affects economic structure and the division of labor between production
|
|
and distribution. It reveals the mechanism by which specialization is enabled
|
|
through market intermediation, though it primarily describes a structural category
|
|
rather than a dynamic process.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Trade Capital
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes trade capital from other forms of capital by its function in exchange and distribution, and specifies its role in connecting surplus with demand. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "capital employed" in this context.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book II, Chapter 5, where he explicitly discusses trade capital and its subdivisions (home trade, foreign trade, carrying trade). The characterization of trade capital as "least productive" in terms of productive labour is faithful to Smith's actual argument.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate for trade capital, as this concept is fundamentally about the mechanisms and processes of exchanging goods between producers and consumers. This is clearly distinct from production, consumption, or other economic domains.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Trade capital has some VSM relevance as it relates to coordination (S2) by connecting different parts of the economy, and potentially to intelligence (S4) through market information flows. However, it doesn't map cleanly to any single VSM system and remains somewhat abstract relative to operational cybernetic functions.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating how capital allocation affects economic structure and the division of labor between production and distribution. It reveals the mechanism by which specialization is enabled through market intermediation, though it primarily describes a structural category rather than a dynamic process.
|