tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
66 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: treasure_trove
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:34:06.672892'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is precise and captures a distinct legal-economic concept
|
|
with clear boundaries - concealed wealth with no provable ownership that becomes
|
|
sovereign revenue. It avoids circularity and identifies specific characteristics
|
|
that distinguish treasure-trove from other forms of wealth or property.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book II, Chapter
|
|
1, where he discusses various sources of sovereign revenue and the economic conditions
|
|
of feudal times. The entity accurately reflects Smith's analysis of how economic
|
|
insecurity led to wealth being concealed rather than productively employed.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as treasure-trove represents
|
|
a regulatory mechanism for handling ownerless property and generating sovereign
|
|
revenue. It fits naturally within the broader category of institutional arrangements
|
|
that govern economic activity.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, mapping primarily to S3 (internal
|
|
regulation) as a mechanism for sovereign revenue collection and property rights
|
|
enforcement. However, it's somewhat historically specific and doesn't strongly
|
|
illuminate ongoing systemic functions in modern economic systems.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The entity provides good explanatory value by illustrating how institutional
|
|
arrangements and economic insecurity can lead to misallocation of resources -
|
|
wealth buried rather than invested productively. It demonstrates the relationship
|
|
between property rights, political stability, and economic efficiency that is
|
|
central to Smith's analysis.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Treasure Trove
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is precise and captures a distinct legal-economic concept with clear boundaries - concealed wealth with no provable ownership that becomes sovereign revenue. It avoids circularity and identifies specific characteristics that distinguish treasure-trove from other forms of wealth or property.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book II, Chapter 1, where he discusses various sources of sovereign revenue and the economic conditions of feudal times. The entity accurately reflects Smith's analysis of how economic insecurity led to wealth being concealed rather than productively employed.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as treasure-trove represents a regulatory mechanism for handling ownerless property and generating sovereign revenue. It fits naturally within the broader category of institutional arrangements that govern economic activity.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity has moderate VSM relevance, mapping primarily to S3 (internal regulation) as a mechanism for sovereign revenue collection and property rights enforcement. However, it's somewhat historically specific and doesn't strongly illuminate ongoing systemic functions in modern economic systems.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The entity provides good explanatory value by illustrating how institutional arrangements and economic insecurity can lead to misallocation of resources - wealth buried rather than invested productively. It demonstrates the relationship between property rights, political stability, and economic efficiency that is central to Smith's analysis.
|