tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: unfunded_debt
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:35:06.946322'
|
|
overall_score: 4.4
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes unfunded debt from funded debt by
|
|
the absence of dedicated revenue streams, and specifies it includes short-term
|
|
obligations and arrears. The definition is precise and non-circular, though it
|
|
could be slightly more specific about the temporal aspects.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's explicit discussion in Book
|
|
V, Chapter 3, where he systematically distinguishes between funded and unfunded
|
|
debt as fundamental categories of government borrowing. Smith clearly presents
|
|
this as the first method governments use when contracting debt.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since this concerns government
|
|
debt management and fiscal policy mechanisms. Unfunded debt represents a regulatory/administrative
|
|
approach to government finance rather than a market mechanism or production concept.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a
|
|
specific regulatory mechanism for government financial management, and potentially
|
|
to S2 (coordination) as it affects how governments coordinate their financial
|
|
obligations. It has clear operational relevance rather than being abstractly theoretical.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in government
|
|
finance - how debt obligations can be contracted without dedicated repayment sources,
|
|
creating specific fiscal dynamics and constraints. This explains a concrete governmental
|
|
financial practice rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Unfunded Debt
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes unfunded debt from funded debt by the absence of dedicated revenue streams, and specifies it includes short-term obligations and arrears. The definition is precise and non-circular, though it could be slightly more specific about the temporal aspects.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's explicit discussion in Book V, Chapter 3, where he systematically distinguishes between funded and unfunded debt as fundamental categories of government borrowing. Smith clearly presents this as the first method governments use when contracting debt.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since this concerns government debt management and fiscal policy mechanisms. Unfunded debt represents a regulatory/administrative approach to government finance rather than a market mechanism or production concept.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a specific regulatory mechanism for government financial management, and potentially to S2 (coordination) as it affects how governments coordinate their financial obligations. It has clear operational relevance rather than being abstractly theoretical.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in government finance - how debt obligations can be contracted without dedicated repayment sources, creating specific fiscal dynamics and constraints. This explains a concrete governmental financial practice rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|