tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: unstamped_bars
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:35:51.040693'
|
|
overall_score: 4.0
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is precise and captures a distinct concept - metal bars
|
|
lacking official certification that require individual verification. It clearly
|
|
distinguishes this from coined money and identifies the specific problems (weighing
|
|
and assaying) that made such bars inconvenient for commerce.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
|
|
4, where he explicitly discusses the inconveniences of using unstamped metal bars
|
|
before coinage was invented. The definition accurately reflects Smith's description
|
|
of the weighing and assaying problems.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate, as unstamped bars represent
|
|
a primitive form of exchange medium that preceded coined money. This fits squarely
|
|
within Smith's discussion of the evolution of exchange mechanisms.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is largely VSM-neutral as it describes a historical exchange
|
|
medium rather than an organizational system or function. While it might tangentially
|
|
relate to S1 (operational transactions), it doesn't naturally map to VSM systems
|
|
since it's about the medium of exchange rather than systemic organization.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory value by illustrating why
|
|
coinage was invented and how it solved specific transactional problems. It helps
|
|
explain the evolutionary progression from barter to coined money by highlighting
|
|
the structural inefficiencies that drove monetary innovation.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Unstamped Bars
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is precise and captures a distinct concept - metal bars lacking official certification that require individual verification. It clearly distinguishes this from coined money and identifies the specific problems (weighing and assaying) that made such bars inconvenient for commerce.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 4, where he explicitly discusses the inconveniences of using unstamped metal bars before coinage was invented. The definition accurately reflects Smith's description of the weighing and assaying problems.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate, as unstamped bars represent a primitive form of exchange medium that preceded coined money. This fits squarely within Smith's discussion of the evolution of exchange mechanisms.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is largely VSM-neutral as it describes a historical exchange medium rather than an organizational system or function. While it might tangentially relate to S1 (operational transactions), it doesn't naturally map to VSM systems since it's about the medium of exchange rather than systemic organization.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides significant explanatory value by illustrating why coinage was invented and how it solved specific transactional problems. It helps explain the evolutionary progression from barter to coined money by highlighting the structural inefficiencies that drove monetary innovation.
|