tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: urban_autonomy
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:35:59.802522'
|
|
overall_score: 4.6
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes urban autonomy as self-governance
|
|
through royal charters, separate from feudal control, with specific institutional
|
|
features (legal systems, commercial regulations). It avoids circularity and captures
|
|
a distinct historical-economic phenomenon rather than a vague concept.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter
|
|
3, where he extensively discusses how towns gained independence from feudal lords
|
|
through charters and privileges. Smith explicitly examines this transition as
|
|
fundamental to commercial development.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate, as urban autonomy fundamentally
|
|
concerns the establishment of new regulatory frameworks and governance structures.
|
|
This represents a shift in who controls economic rules and how they are enforced.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Urban autonomy maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it establishes
|
|
new governance and audit mechanisms, and to S5 (identity/policy) as it represents
|
|
towns defining their own identity separate from feudal structures. The institutional
|
|
framework aspect gives it clear VSM relevance.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity illuminates a crucial structural mechanism in Smith's account
|
|
of how market economies emerged from feudal systems. It explains the institutional
|
|
prerequisites for commercial development and shows how governance structures enable
|
|
economic transformation.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Urban Autonomy
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes urban autonomy as self-governance through royal charters, separate from feudal control, with specific institutional features (legal systems, commercial regulations). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct historical-economic phenomenon rather than a vague concept.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 3, where he extensively discusses how towns gained independence from feudal lords through charters and privileges. Smith explicitly examines this transition as fundamental to commercial development.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate, as urban autonomy fundamentally concerns the establishment of new regulatory frameworks and governance structures. This represents a shift in who controls economic rules and how they are enforced.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Urban autonomy maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it establishes new governance and audit mechanisms, and to S5 (identity/policy) as it represents towns defining their own identity separate from feudal structures. The institutional framework aspect gives it clear VSM relevance.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates a crucial structural mechanism in Smith's account of how market economies emerged from feudal systems. It explains the institutional prerequisites for commercial development and shows how governance structures enable economic transformation.
|