tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: victuals
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:37:18.388872'
|
|
overall_score: 4.0
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is clear and precise, specifically identifying victuals
|
|
as food and provisions used in payment systems, with a concrete historical example.
|
|
It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept within the broader context
|
|
of non-monetary exchange systems.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text, where he explicitly
|
|
discusses how ancient Saxon kings received revenues in the form of victuals and
|
|
provisions rather than money. The concept accurately reflects Smith's historical
|
|
analysis of the evolution from payment in kind to monetary systems.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The placement in the "Exchange" domain is entirely appropriate, as victuals
|
|
represent a form of payment and exchange mechanism that predates monetary systems.
|
|
This fits perfectly within the broader economic theme of how exchange systems
|
|
evolved.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is largely VSM-neutral as it describes a historical form
|
|
of payment rather than an organizational system or function. While it might tangentially
|
|
relate to S1 (as a basic operational resource), it doesn't naturally map to any
|
|
specific VSM system.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The entity provides valuable explanatory power by illustrating the historical
|
|
transition from barter/payment-in-kind to monetary systems, helping to explain
|
|
how modern exchange mechanisms evolved. It demonstrates a concrete mechanism in
|
|
the development of economic systems rather than just naming a surface phenomenon.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Victuals
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is clear and precise, specifically identifying victuals as food and provisions used in payment systems, with a concrete historical example. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept within the broader context of non-monetary exchange systems.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text, where he explicitly discusses how ancient Saxon kings received revenues in the form of victuals and provisions rather than money. The concept accurately reflects Smith's historical analysis of the evolution from payment in kind to monetary systems.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The placement in the "Exchange" domain is entirely appropriate, as victuals represent a form of payment and exchange mechanism that predates monetary systems. This fits perfectly within the broader economic theme of how exchange systems evolved.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is largely VSM-neutral as it describes a historical form of payment rather than an organizational system or function. While it might tangentially relate to S1 (as a basic operational resource), it doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The entity provides valuable explanatory power by illustrating the historical transition from barter/payment-in-kind to monetary systems, helping to explain how modern exchange mechanisms evolved. It demonstrates a concrete mechanism in the development of economic systems rather than just naming a surface phenomenon.
|