tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
66 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: villeinage
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:37:28.070782'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: 'The definition is quite precise, clearly distinguishing villeinage from
|
|
other forms of servitude by specifying key characteristics: bound to land, sold
|
|
with land but not separately, requiring master consent for marriage, and property
|
|
acquisition limitations. It avoids circularity and provides concrete distinguishing
|
|
features.'
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book III, Chapter
|
|
2, where he extensively discusses the historical transition from feudal labor
|
|
arrangements. The definition accurately reflects Smith's analysis of villeinage
|
|
as a historical labor institution and its gradual disappearance.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain placement is highly appropriate, as villeinage
|
|
represents a regulatory framework governing labor relations, property rights,
|
|
and social obligations. This institutional arrangement fundamentally concerns
|
|
how economic activity was regulated within the feudal system.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Villeinage has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S3 (internal
|
|
regulation) as a control mechanism governing labor and land use within feudal
|
|
systems. However, it's somewhat abstract as a historical institution rather than
|
|
an active operational component of economic systems.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the structural
|
|
mechanisms of pre-capitalist labor relations and how institutional constraints
|
|
shaped economic behavior. It helps explain the historical transition to more flexible
|
|
labor arrangements that Smith sees as crucial for economic development.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Villeinage
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is quite precise, clearly distinguishing villeinage from other forms of servitude by specifying key characteristics: bound to land, sold with land but not separately, requiring master consent for marriage, and property acquisition limitations. It avoids circularity and provides concrete distinguishing features.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book III, Chapter 2, where he extensively discusses the historical transition from feudal labor arrangements. The definition accurately reflects Smith's analysis of villeinage as a historical labor institution and its gradual disappearance.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain placement is highly appropriate, as villeinage represents a regulatory framework governing labor relations, property rights, and social obligations. This institutional arrangement fundamentally concerns how economic activity was regulated within the feudal system.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Villeinage has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S3 (internal regulation) as a control mechanism governing labor and land use within feudal systems. However, it's somewhat abstract as a historical institution rather than an active operational component of economic systems.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the structural mechanisms of pre-capitalist labor relations and how institutional constraints shaped economic behavior. It helps explain the historical transition to more flexible labor arrangements that Smith sees as crucial for economic development.
|