664 lines
23 KiB
Markdown
664 lines
23 KiB
Markdown
# Map Economic Entities to VSM Concepts
|
|
|
|
You are a systems theorist specializing in Stafford Beer's Viable System Model.
|
|
Your task is to map extracted economic entities to VSM concepts.
|
|
|
|
## Extracted Entities
|
|
|
|
--- ENTITY: stock lent at interest ---
|
|
|
|
# Stock Lent at Interest
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Capital that is loaned to borrowers who pay an annual rent (interest) for its use, with the expectation that the original capital will be returned in full at the end of the loan period. This form of lending creates a distinct economic relationship where the lender transfers the right to employ the capital to the borrower while maintaining ownership.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
This chapter forms the central discussion of how capital functions when transferred through lending arrangements. Smith distinguishes between productive use of borrowed capital (which generates returns sufficient to repay both principal and interest) and unproductive consumption (which leads to dissipation of capital). The analysis establishes the foundation for understanding interest rates, the monied interest, and the economic consequences of different borrowing patterns.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: monied interest ---
|
|
|
|
# Monied Interest
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The economic sector composed of those who lend capital at interest rather than employing it directly in trade, manufacturing, or land ownership. This interest is distinct from landed and trading/manufacturing interests because the owners of capital in this sector derive revenue without personally managing the productive use of their funds.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith introduces this concept while explaining how the quantity of stock available for lending is determined not by the amount of money in circulation but by the portion of annual produce destined for capital replacement that owners choose not to employ themselves. The monied interest represents a third economic sector alongside landed and trading/manufacturing interests.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: productive labourers ---
|
|
|
|
# Productive Labourers
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Workers who produce goods or services that have exchange value and can be stored or accumulated as capital. Their labour creates value that can be exchanged for other goods or services, and they are maintained by capital employed in productive enterprises.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith contrasts productive labourers with idle consumers, explaining that when borrowed capital is used productively, it maintains workers who reproduce the value of the capital with profit. This distinction is crucial for understanding when lending arrangements are economically beneficial versus when they lead to capital dissipation.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: idle consumers ---
|
|
|
|
# Idle Consumers
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Individuals who consume goods and services without producing anything of exchangeable value in return. Their consumption represents a pure dissipation of capital rather than its reproduction or accumulation.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith uses this concept to illustrate the destructive use of borrowed capital when it is employed for immediate consumption rather than productive purposes. The existence of idle consumers demonstrates the economic harm that occurs when capital is lent for consumption rather than production.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Consumption
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: prodigals ---
|
|
|
|
# Prodigals
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Economic actors who dissipate capital through unproductive consumption, spending borrowed funds on immediate gratification rather than employing them in ways that generate returns. They act as economic destroyers of value rather than creators.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith employs this concept to contrast with frugal and industrious borrowers, arguing that lending to prodigals is economically harmful to both parties. The prodigal represents the antithesis of sound economic behaviour in Smith's framework.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Consumption
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: frugal and industrious borrowers ---
|
|
|
|
# Frugal and Industrious Borrowers
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Economic actors who borrow capital with the intention of employing it productively to generate returns that exceed the cost of borrowing. They represent the economically beneficial use of credit in Smith's analysis.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith argues that these borrowers far outnumber prodigals and that lending to them is economically beneficial for both parties. This concept helps establish the general economic benefit of interest-bearing loans when employed productively.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: country gentlemen ---
|
|
|
|
# Country Gentlemen
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Landowners who borrow money, typically through mortgages, not for immediate consumption but to replace capital they have already consumed through extended credit arrangements with tradesmen and shopkeepers. Their borrowing pattern represents a specific form of capital replacement rather than capital creation.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith uses this group to illustrate a particular borrowing pattern where the capital is not truly new but replaces previously consumed capital. This analysis helps explain why lending to this group, while not highly profitable, is not necessarily economically destructive.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: money's worth ---
|
|
|
|
# Money's Worth
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The actual goods and services that money can purchase, as opposed to the money itself. This concept emphasizes that what borrowers truly need is not currency but the productive capacity and consumable goods that currency represents.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith introduces this concept to explain that loans are fundamentally about transferring access to the annual produce of land and labour, not merely transferring pieces of money. This distinction is crucial for understanding the real economic function of lending.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: annual produce of land and labour ---
|
|
|
|
# Annual Produce of Land and Labour
|
|
|
|
# Annual Produce of Land and Labour
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The total output generated each year through agricultural production and human labour. This represents the fundamental source of all economic value and the pool from which all revenues, including interest payments, must ultimately be drawn.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith uses this concept to explain how lending operates as an assignment of rights to portions of this annual produce. The size of this pool determines the total amount of capital that can be lent at interest in any economy.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: capital replacement ---
|
|
|
|
# Capital Replacement
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The process by which worn-out or consumed capital goods are restored through new production, ensuring the continuation of productive capacity. This function is essential for maintaining economic output over time.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith distinguishes between capital used for replacement and capital used for expansion, arguing that the portion of annual produce destined for replacement but not employed by its owners constitutes the pool available for lending at interest.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: market price of things ---
|
|
|
|
# Market Price of Things
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The actual price at which goods and services exchange in the market, determined by supply and demand rather than by any intrinsic value. This price fluctuates based on the quantity of goods available relative to the money supply.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith references this concept while discussing how the quantity of money affects nominal prices but not real economic value, arguing that changes in the money supply affect prices but not the underlying productive capacity of the economy.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: profits of stock ---
|
|
|
|
# Profits of Stock
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The returns earned by owners of capital when they employ it productively in trade, manufacturing, or agriculture. These profits represent the compensation for the risk and trouble of employing capital and tend to diminish as the quantity of capital in a country increases.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith explains that as capitals increase, profits necessarily diminish due to increased competition for profitable employment opportunities. This relationship between capital quantity and profit rates is fundamental to understanding interest rate determination.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: rate of interest ---
|
|
|
|
# Rate of Interest
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The price paid for the use of borrowed capital, typically expressed as a percentage of the principal per year. This rate is determined by the balance between the supply of lendable capital and the demand for its use in productive enterprises.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith provides a comprehensive analysis of how interest rates are determined, arguing that they naturally fall as the quantity of capital in a country increases and profitable employment opportunities become scarcer.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: legal rate of interest ---
|
|
|
|
# Legal Rate of Interest
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The maximum interest rate permitted by law, established to prevent usury while allowing sufficient compensation for lenders to provide credit to productive enterprises. This rate should be set slightly above the lowest market rate to balance competing economic interests.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith discusses the economic effects of legal interest rate regulation, arguing that rates set too high direct capital toward prodigals and projectors, while rates set too low drive legitimate borrowers to illegal lenders.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Regulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: usury ---
|
|
|
|
# Usury
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The practice of charging excessively high interest rates on loans, typically beyond what is legally permitted or economically justified by the productive use of the borrowed capital.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith discusses usury in the context of legal interest rate regulation, arguing that prohibition of interest above legal rates often increases rather than decreases usurious practices by forcing legitimate transactions underground.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Regulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: prodigals and projectors ---
|
|
|
|
# Prodigals and Projectors
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Economic actors who are willing to pay extremely high interest rates for borrowed capital. Prodigals seek funds for immediate consumption, while projectors pursue speculative ventures with uncertain returns. Both represent economically risky borrowers.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith argues that when legal interest rates are set too high, capital flows toward these risky borrowers rather than to sober, productive enterprises, thereby harming the overall economy.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: sober people ---
|
|
|
|
# Sober People
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Economic actors who borrow capital with the intention of employing it productively and are willing to pay reasonable interest rates based on expected returns. They represent the economically beneficial use of credit.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith argues that when legal interest rates are set appropriately, capital flows toward these borrowers rather than to risky speculators, thereby benefiting the overall economy through productive investment.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: market rate of interest ---
|
|
|
|
# Market Rate of Interest
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The actual rate of interest determined by supply and demand in the credit market, as opposed to any legally prescribed maximum rate. This rate fluctuates based on the balance between available capital and profitable investment opportunities.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith argues that no law can reduce the common rate of interest below the lowest ordinary market rate at the time the law is made, as lenders will find ways to evade regulations that prevent them from receiving fair compensation.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: ordinary market price of land ---
|
|
|
|
# Ordinary Market Price of Land
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The typical price at which land sells in the market, determined by the relationship between the expected income from land ownership and the returns available from lending money at interest. This price reflects the relative attractiveness of land investment versus financial investment.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 4
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith explains that land prices are determined by the comparison between land rents and interest rates, with land typically commanding a premium due to its superior security but requiring a lower return than financial investments.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
## VSM Framework Reference
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
id: vsm-framework
|
|
name: vsm_framework
|
|
artifact_type: content
|
|
description: Stafford Beer's Viable System Model reference for economic analysis
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Stafford Beer's Viable System Model (VSM)
|
|
|
|
The Viable System Model (VSM) is a model of the organisational structure of any
|
|
autonomous system capable of producing itself. It was created by management
|
|
cybernetician Stafford Beer in his books *Brain of the Firm* (1972) and
|
|
*The Heart of Enterprise* (1979).
|
|
|
|
## Core Principle: Viability
|
|
|
|
A viable system is any system organised in such a way as to meet the demands
|
|
of surviving in a changing environment. One of the prime features of systems
|
|
that survive is that they are adaptable. The VSM expresses a model for a
|
|
viable system, which is an abstracted cybernetic description applicable to
|
|
any organisation that is a going concern.
|
|
|
|
## The Five Systems
|
|
|
|
### System 1 (S1) — Operations
|
|
|
|
The primary activities that produce the organisation's purpose. These are the
|
|
operational units that directly create value. Each operational element is itself
|
|
a viable system (the principle of recursion).
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Productive enterprises, factories, farms, workshops,
|
|
individual labourers performing specialised tasks, merchant operations.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Autonomy within constraints, self-organisation,
|
|
direct engagement with the environment.
|
|
|
|
### System 2 (S2) — Coordination
|
|
|
|
The information channels and bodies that allow the primary activities in
|
|
System 1 to communicate with each other and that allow System 3 to monitor
|
|
and coordinate activities. System 2 dampens oscillations and resolves
|
|
conflicts between operational units.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market price mechanisms, trade customs, standard
|
|
weights and measures, commercial law, banking clearinghouses, trade guilds.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Anti-oscillatory, dampening, scheduling, conflict
|
|
resolution, standardisation.
|
|
|
|
### System 3 (S3) — Control / Operational Management
|
|
|
|
The structures and controls that establish the rules, resources, rights,
|
|
and responsibilities of System 1 and provide an interface between Systems 1
|
|
and Systems 4/5. System 3 represents the day-to-day control of the
|
|
organisation. It optimises the internal environment.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Government regulation of trade, taxation policy, labour
|
|
laws, enforcement of contracts, the "invisible hand" as emergent internal
|
|
regulation, guilds and corporations governing members.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Internal regulation, resource allocation, accountability,
|
|
synergy extraction, performance management.
|
|
|
|
### System 3* (S3*) — Audit / Monitoring
|
|
|
|
The audit and monitoring channel that allows System 3 to verify information
|
|
coming from System 1 through channels other than those provided by System 2.
|
|
System 3* provides sporadic, direct access to operational reality.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market inspections, quality checks, auditing of accounts,
|
|
surprise investigations into trade practices, verification of weights and measures.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Sporadic direct investigation, reality checking, bypassing
|
|
normal reporting channels.
|
|
|
|
### System 4 (S4) — Intelligence / Adaptation
|
|
|
|
The bodies and processes that look outward to the environment to monitor
|
|
how the organisation needs to adapt to remain viable. System 4 captures
|
|
all relevant information about the outside-and-then environment. It is
|
|
responsible for strategic responses.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Foreign intelligence about trade opportunities,
|
|
market research, new technology adoption, colonial exploration and trade
|
|
route development, understanding of foreign economic systems.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Environmental scanning, future orientation, strategic
|
|
planning, modelling, research and development.
|
|
|
|
### System 5 (S5) — Policy / Identity
|
|
|
|
The policy-making body that balances demands from Systems 3 and 4 and defines
|
|
the identity, values, and purpose of the organisation. System 5 provides
|
|
closure to the whole system and represents its supreme authority.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Sovereign authority, constitutional principles governing
|
|
economic policy, national economic identity, the philosophical foundations
|
|
of economic systems (mercantilism vs. free trade), the overarching purpose
|
|
of the commonwealth.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Identity, ethos, supreme command, policy closure,
|
|
balancing internal and external perspectives.
|
|
|
|
## Key Concepts
|
|
|
|
### Recursion
|
|
|
|
Every viable system contains and is contained in a viable system. The same
|
|
five-system structure recurs at every level of organisation. A workshop is
|
|
a viable system within a factory, which is a viable system within an
|
|
industry, which is a viable system within a national economy.
|
|
|
|
### Variety
|
|
|
|
A measure of the number of possible states of a system. The Law of Requisite
|
|
Variety (Ashby's Law) states that only variety can absorb variety. A
|
|
controller must have at least as much variety as the system it controls.
|
|
|
|
### Requisite Variety
|
|
|
|
The principle that for effective regulation, the variety of the regulator
|
|
must match the variety of the system being regulated. This is achieved
|
|
through variety attenuation (reducing the variety coming up from operations)
|
|
and variety amplification (increasing the variety of management's responses).
|
|
|
|
### Attenuation and Amplification
|
|
|
|
Variety engineering mechanisms. Attenuation reduces variety (e.g., reporting
|
|
summaries, statistical aggregation, standardisation). Amplification increases
|
|
variety (e.g., delegation, empowerment, decentralisation).
|
|
|
|
### Algedonic Signals
|
|
|
|
Emergency signals that bypass the normal management hierarchy to alert
|
|
higher systems of critical situations requiring immediate attention. Named
|
|
from the Greek words for pain (algos) and pleasure (hedone).
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market panics, famine signals, sudden price collapses,
|
|
trade embargoes, economic crises that demand immediate sovereign intervention.
|
|
|
|
### Autonomy
|
|
|
|
The degree of freedom granted to operational units (System 1) to self-organise
|
|
within constraints set by System 3. Beer argued that maximum autonomy
|
|
consistent with systemic cohesion yields maximum viability.
|
|
|
|
### Viability
|
|
|
|
The capacity of a system to maintain a separate existence and survive in a
|
|
changing environment. A viable system continuously adapts while maintaining
|
|
its identity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Mapping Guidelines
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
id: mapping-rules
|
|
name: mapping_rules
|
|
artifact_type: content
|
|
description: Guidelines for mapping economic entities to VSM concepts
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# VSM Mapping Rules
|
|
|
|
## Mapping Principles
|
|
|
|
1. **Ground in Beer's definitions.** Every mapping rationale must reference
|
|
the specific VSM system function, not just a superficial resemblance.
|
|
|
|
2. **Prefer structural over metaphorical mappings.** A mapping is strong
|
|
when the economic entity performs the same *functional role* in Smith's
|
|
economic system as the VSM component performs in an organisation.
|
|
|
|
3. **Allow multiple mappings.** A single economic entity may map to
|
|
multiple VSM systems. For example, "the sovereign" may map to both
|
|
S3 (regulation) and S5 (policy). Create separate mapping documents
|
|
for each relationship.
|
|
|
|
4. **Respect recursion.** Consider at which level of recursion the mapping
|
|
applies. The division of labour within a single workshop (S1-level)
|
|
differs from the division of labour across an entire national economy
|
|
(higher recursion level).
|
|
|
|
## Mapping Strength Criteria
|
|
|
|
### Strong
|
|
- The entity directly performs the function of the VSM system.
|
|
- The mapping would be recognisable to a VSM practitioner without explanation.
|
|
- Example: "market price mechanism" → S2 (Coordination) — prices coordinate
|
|
supply and demand between producers.
|
|
|
|
### Moderate
|
|
- The entity partially performs the function or performs it in a limited context.
|
|
- The mapping requires some argument but is defensible.
|
|
- Example: "merchant" → S4 (Intelligence) — merchants gather information
|
|
about foreign markets, but this is not their primary function.
|
|
|
|
### Weak
|
|
- The mapping is speculative or metaphorical rather than structural.
|
|
- The connection exists but requires significant interpretive work.
|
|
- Example: "moral sentiments" → S5 (Policy) — broad ethical framework
|
|
shapes economic behaviour, but the connection is indirect.
|
|
|
|
## What NOT to Map
|
|
|
|
- Do not force mappings where none exist. It is valid for an entity to have
|
|
no clear VSM mapping — flag it with "Mapping Strength: Weak" and explain
|
|
the difficulty.
|
|
- Do not map purely descriptive/historical content that lacks functional
|
|
significance.
|
|
|
|
## VSM System Checklist
|
|
|
|
When mapping, consider each system:
|
|
|
|
| System | Question to Ask |
|
|
|--------|----------------|
|
|
| S1 | Does this entity directly produce value or output? |
|
|
| S2 | Does this entity coordinate between operational units? |
|
|
| S3 | Does this entity regulate internal operations? |
|
|
| S3* | Does this entity provide audit or verification? |
|
|
| S4 | Does this entity scan the environment or plan for the future? |
|
|
| S5 | Does this entity define identity, policy, or purpose? |
|
|
|
|
Also consider the key concepts:
|
|
- **Recursion**: At what level does this entity operate?
|
|
- **Variety**: Does this entity manage variety (attenuate or amplify)?
|
|
- **Algedonic signals**: Does this entity serve as an emergency signal?
|
|
- **Autonomy**: Does this entity relate to operational autonomy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Instructions
|
|
|
|
1. Review each extracted economic entity carefully.
|
|
2. For each entity, determine which VSM system(s) it most closely relates to.
|
|
3. Produce a mapping document for each entity-VSM relationship following
|
|
the VSM Mapping Schema v1.0.
|
|
4. Each mapping document must include:
|
|
- An H1 heading in the format "Entity Name -> VSM Concept Name"
|
|
- An Economic Entity Reference section
|
|
- A VSM Concept Reference section
|
|
- A Mapping Rationale section (minimum 30 words) grounded in Beer's definitions
|
|
- A Mapping Strength section rated as Strong, Moderate, or Weak
|
|
5. Where an entity maps to multiple VSM systems (recursion), create
|
|
separate mapping documents for each relationship.
|
|
6. Flag entities that don't clearly map to any VSM concept with a
|
|
"Mapping Strength: Weak" and note the difficulty in the rationale.
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
|
|
Output each mapping as a separate markdown document, delimited by
|
|
`--- MAPPING: <entity-name>-to-<vsm-concept> ---` markers.
|