tegwick
574bb11db6
Demonstrates infospace composition: the Wealth of Nations infospace is used as a discipline, applying Smith's economic framework as a lens to analyse modern supply chain management concepts. New example: examples/supply-chain-vsm/ - infospace.yaml binding WoN as discipline (../infospace-with-history) - 3 source documents: coordination mechanisms, capital & inventory, market structure (~400 words each, original content) - supply-chain-entity-schema-v1.0.md with WoN Concept required section - won-mapping-schema-v1.0.md with Conceptual Continuity rating - artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md — 12 curated WoN entities for injection as discipline context - 8 hand-crafted entity files demonstrating LLM output format - 3 mapping files with full rationale and VSM inheritance chains - Viable: YES (5/5 thresholds) Key mappings demonstrated: Demand Signal → Effectual Demand (Strong, S2) Vendor-Managed Inventory → Division of Labour (Strong, S1/S2) Just-in-Time Inventory → Circulating Capital (Strong, S1/S3) Bullwhip Effect → Natural Price (Moderate, S2) Platform Intermediary → Merchant Capital (Strong, S2/S4) Monopsony Power → Combination of Masters (Strong, S3*) Platform fix: entity_parser.py now recognises ## Supply Chain Domain as a domain alias for ## Economic Domain, enabling composed infospaces to use their own domain section name. Tutorial §13 rewritten with real commands, real output, and the full mapping table from the demo. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
55 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
55 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
# WoN Mapping Schema v1.0
|
||
|
||
Every mapping from a supply chain entity to a Wealth of Nations concept
|
||
must contain the following sections.
|
||
|
||
## Required Sections
|
||
|
||
### H1 Heading
|
||
|
||
Format: `Supply Chain Entity → WoN Entity`
|
||
|
||
Example: `# Bullwhip Effect → Natural Price as Central Price`
|
||
|
||
### Supply Chain Entity
|
||
|
||
The supply chain entity being mapped (title case name).
|
||
|
||
### WoN Entity
|
||
|
||
The Wealth of Nations entity being mapped to. Must be an entity that
|
||
exists in the WoN infospace (see `artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md`
|
||
for the curated reference set).
|
||
|
||
### Mapping Rationale
|
||
|
||
Minimum 40 words. Explain why this supply chain concept corresponds to
|
||
this WoN concept. Ground the mapping in both the supply chain definition
|
||
and Smith's original analysis. Do not rely on surface-level name similarity.
|
||
|
||
### Conceptual Continuity
|
||
|
||
One of: **Strong**, **Moderate**, **Weak**
|
||
|
||
- **Strong**: The modern concept directly instantiates the WoN concept —
|
||
same mechanism, different technology or scale
|
||
- **Moderate**: The modern concept resembles the WoN concept in structure
|
||
but differs in important ways
|
||
- **Weak**: The mapping is analogical — useful for analysis but not a
|
||
direct correspondence
|
||
|
||
### VSM Inheritance
|
||
|
||
Because the WoN entity is already mapped to a VSM system in the WoN
|
||
infospace, the supply chain entity inherits a VSM position by transitivity.
|
||
State: `[Supply Chain Entity] inherits [VSM System] via [WoN Entity]`
|
||
|
||
## Quality Metrics
|
||
|
||
- **Rationale Rigour** (1–5): Is the mapping justified by substantive
|
||
analysis, not just surface similarity?
|
||
- **Continuity Calibration** (1–5): Is the declared strength consistent
|
||
with the rationale?
|
||
- **VSM Coherence** (1–5): Does the inherited VSM assignment make sense
|
||
for the supply chain entity?
|