Implements markitect/llm/ package with concrete LLMAdapter implementations:
- OpenRouterAdapter: HTTP via urllib with retry/backoff on 429/5xx
- ClaudeCodeAdapter: subprocess-based Claude CLI with stdin piping
- Factory pattern: create_adapter("openrouter") or create_adapter("claude-code")
- API key resolution chain: constructor > env var > project-root key file
- 42 unit tests, 2 integration tests (gated on API key / CLI availability)
Also adds the infospace-with-history example with Wealth of Nations VSM
analysis pipeline, templates, schemas, source chapters, and processed
output for chapters 1-2. process_chapters.py now supports --provider
and --model flags for automatic LLM-driven processing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
253 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
253 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
--- ENTITY: propensity-to-truck-barter-and-exchange ---
|
|
|
|
# Propensity to Truck, Barter, and Exchange
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
An innate or fundamental disposition in human nature to negotiate, trade, and
|
|
exchange goods with others. Smith identifies this propensity as the ultimate
|
|
cause of the division of labour, arguing that it is unique to humans and
|
|
absent in all other animal species. He leaves open whether it is a primary
|
|
instinct or a consequence of the faculties of reason and speech, but treats
|
|
it as the foundational mechanism from which specialisation and economic
|
|
organisation emerge.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book I, Chapter 2: "Of the Principle which gives Occasion to the Division
|
|
of Labour"
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
This is the central thesis of the chapter. Smith argues that the division of
|
|
labour "is not originally the effect of any human wisdom" but rather the
|
|
"necessary, though very slow and gradual, consequence" of this propensity.
|
|
The entire chapter serves to establish exchange as the causal origin of
|
|
specialisation.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
General Theory
|
|
|
|
## Smith's Original Wording
|
|
|
|
"This division of labour, from which so many advantages are derived, is not
|
|
originally the effect of any human wisdom, which foresees and intends that
|
|
general opulence to which it gives occasion. It is the necessary, though very
|
|
slow and gradual, consequence of a certain propensity in human nature [...] the
|
|
propensity to truck, barter, and exchange one thing for another."
|
|
|
|
## Modern Interpretation
|
|
|
|
This concept prefigures the modern economic assumption of rational self-interest
|
|
as the basis of market behaviour. It also anticipates evolutionary and
|
|
institutional economics debates about whether exchange is a natural disposition
|
|
or a culturally constructed institution.
|
|
|
|
--- ENTITY: self-interest ---
|
|
|
|
# Self-interest
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The motivation of individuals to pursue their own advantage in economic
|
|
transactions. Smith argues that in civilised society, individuals obtain the
|
|
co-operation of others not through appeals to benevolence but by engaging
|
|
their self-love — showing them that it is to their own advantage to provide
|
|
what is desired. Self-interest is the engine that makes exchange function:
|
|
each party to a bargain acts from regard to their own benefit.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book I, Chapter 2: "Of the Principle which gives Occasion to the Division
|
|
of Labour"
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith introduces self-interest through the celebrated passage about the
|
|
butcher, brewer, and baker. He contrasts it with benevolence, arguing that
|
|
we cannot rely on the goodwill of others for our daily needs in a society
|
|
of many, and that self-interest provides a more reliable and universal basis
|
|
for economic co-operation.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
General Theory
|
|
|
|
## Smith's Original Wording
|
|
|
|
"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that
|
|
we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address
|
|
ourselves, not to their humanity, but to their self-love, and never talk to
|
|
them of our own necessities, but of their advantages."
|
|
|
|
--- ENTITY: the-bargain ---
|
|
|
|
# The Bargain
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
A voluntary bilateral exchange in which each party offers something the other
|
|
wants. Smith defines the bargain as the fundamental unit of economic
|
|
interaction: "Give me that which I want, and you shall have this which you
|
|
want." It is through bargaining that individuals obtain "the far greater part
|
|
of those good offices which we stand in need of" in civilised society, as
|
|
opposed to relying on benevolence or coercion.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book I, Chapter 2: "Of the Principle which gives Occasion to the Division
|
|
of Labour"
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
The bargain is presented as the practical expression of the propensity to
|
|
exchange. Smith argues that it is the dominant mode of economic interaction,
|
|
used even by beggars who exchange charity-received goods for things they
|
|
actually need.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
## Smith's Original Wording
|
|
|
|
"Whoever offers to another a bargain of any kind, proposes to do this. Give
|
|
me that which I want, and you shall have this which you want, is the meaning
|
|
of every such offer."
|
|
|
|
--- ENTITY: benevolence ---
|
|
|
|
# Benevolence
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The disposition to do good to others out of goodwill rather than self-interest.
|
|
Smith argues that benevolence is an insufficient basis for economic organisation
|
|
in a complex society. While a person may secure the friendship of a few through
|
|
appeals to benevolence, they cannot rely on it to obtain the co-operation of
|
|
the "great multitudes" they need in civilised life. Even beggars, who depend
|
|
chiefly on benevolence for their subsistence, conduct most of their actual
|
|
transactions through exchange.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book I, Chapter 2: "Of the Principle which gives Occasion to the Division
|
|
of Labour"
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Benevolence serves as the foil to self-interest. Smith systematically argues
|
|
that while benevolence exists, it cannot scale to support the complex
|
|
interdependencies of a specialised economy, making self-interested exchange
|
|
the necessary coordinating mechanism.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
General Theory
|
|
|
|
--- ENTITY: surplus-produce ---
|
|
|
|
# Surplus Produce
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The portion of a worker's output that exceeds their own consumption needs and
|
|
is therefore available for exchange. Smith argues that the certainty of being
|
|
able to exchange surplus produce for the products of other workers' labour
|
|
is what encourages every person to dedicate themselves to a particular
|
|
occupation. Surplus is thus both the material prerequisite and the incentive
|
|
for specialisation.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book I, Chapter 2: "Of the Principle which gives Occasion to the Division
|
|
of Labour"
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Introduced in the passage describing the emergence of specialised trades in
|
|
a tribal society. The armourer, carpenter, smith, and tanner each produce
|
|
more of their specialty than they can personally consume, and exchange the
|
|
surplus for other goods, reinforcing their commitment to specialisation.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
## Smith's Original Wording
|
|
|
|
"And thus the certainty of being able to exchange all that surplus part of
|
|
the produce of his own labour, which is over and above his own consumption,
|
|
for such parts of the produce of other men's labour as he may have occasion
|
|
for, encourages every man to apply himself to a particular occupation."
|
|
|
|
--- ENTITY: difference-of-talents ---
|
|
|
|
# Difference of Talents
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The observable variation in skills, aptitudes, and abilities among individuals
|
|
in different occupations. Smith makes the striking argument that this
|
|
difference is largely the effect rather than the cause of the division of
|
|
labour: people are born with roughly equal abilities, and it is their
|
|
different occupations, shaped by habit, custom, and education, that create
|
|
the apparent differences. He contrasts humans with dogs, where natural breed
|
|
differences are far greater but cannot be made useful because animals lack
|
|
the capacity for exchange.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book I, Chapter 2: "Of the Principle which gives Occasion to the Division
|
|
of Labour"
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
This argument occupies the final portion of the chapter. Smith uses it to
|
|
reinforce his claim that exchange, not innate difference, is the driver of
|
|
specialisation. The philosopher and the street porter were "very much alike"
|
|
until different employments shaped them differently.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
General Theory
|
|
|
|
## Smith's Original Wording
|
|
|
|
"The difference of natural talents in different men, is, in reality, much
|
|
less than we are aware of; and the very different genius which appears to
|
|
distinguish men of different professions, when grown up to maturity, is not
|
|
upon many occasions so much the cause, as the effect of the division of
|
|
labour."
|
|
|
|
--- ENTITY: common-stock ---
|
|
|
|
# Common Stock
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The aggregate pool of goods and services created when individuals bring
|
|
their diverse specialised products together through exchange. Smith argues
|
|
that among humans, unlike animals, different talents are made useful to
|
|
one another because their products can be "brought, as it were, into a
|
|
common stock, where every man may purchase whatever part of the produce
|
|
of other men's talents he has occasion for." This common stock is the
|
|
emergent result of widespread exchange among specialised producers.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book I, Chapter 2: "Of the Principle which gives Occasion to the Division
|
|
of Labour"
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Appears in the chapter's concluding argument comparing humans and animals.
|
|
While a mastiff cannot benefit from a greyhound's speed due to lack of
|
|
exchange, humans can pool their different abilities through trade, making
|
|
all talents contribute to the general welfare.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|