Add enablement intent
This commit is contained in:
136
INTENT.md
Normal file
136
INTENT.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
||||
# INTENT
|
||||
|
||||
> This file captures **why this repository exists**,
|
||||
> the **direction it is moving toward**, and
|
||||
> the **kind of system it is meant to become**.
|
||||
> It is intentionally **aspirational and stable**, not a description of current implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## One-liner
|
||||
|
||||
**The developer enablement layer - turning Railiance platform capabilities into paved paths for building, testing, packaging, and promoting workloads.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Why This Exists
|
||||
|
||||
A healthy platform does not automatically make delivery easy.
|
||||
Developers and operators still need repeatable ways to build workloads, test
|
||||
them, package them, route them through review, and hand them to application
|
||||
release surfaces without inventing those paths from scratch each time.
|
||||
|
||||
Without a disciplined enablement layer:
|
||||
|
||||
* every workload invents a different pipeline,
|
||||
* build and deployment templates drift,
|
||||
* platform capabilities are hard to consume correctly,
|
||||
* and application releases depend on undocumented operator memory.
|
||||
|
||||
This layer exists to provide **paved delivery paths**: shared automation,
|
||||
templates, SDKs, build conventions, and self-service workflows that let
|
||||
Railiance evolve faster without dissolving its layer boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The Mission
|
||||
|
||||
> *Where we are going.*
|
||||
|
||||
To become the **canonical home for developer and delivery enablement** -
|
||||
CI/CD pipelines, GitOps workflows, workload templates, SDKs, buildpacks,
|
||||
developer portal surfaces, and promotion conventions that help source repos
|
||||
move safely toward S5 application releases.
|
||||
|
||||
This means:
|
||||
|
||||
* Common delivery paths are **automated and reusable**
|
||||
* Build and deployment templates encode **Railiance platform expectations**
|
||||
* Developers get fast feedback through **standard checks and pipelines**
|
||||
* S5 can consume release artifacts through **clear handoff contracts**
|
||||
* Enablement improves delivery without taking ownership of app runtime
|
||||
operation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Paved Paths, Not One-Off Pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
The default way to build, test, package, and promote a workload should be
|
||||
shared, documented, and easy to reuse.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Enablement, Not Applications
|
||||
|
||||
This layer helps applications reach production; it does not own their source
|
||||
code, runtime configuration, or user-facing operations.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Platform-Aware Templates
|
||||
|
||||
Templates, SDKs, and buildpacks should encode the contracts exposed by S1-S3 so
|
||||
consumers do not need to rediscover platform assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Clear Handoff to S5
|
||||
|
||||
CI/CD and promotion flows should produce artifacts, metadata, and evidence that
|
||||
the application layer can deploy and verify without guessing.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Fast Feedback
|
||||
|
||||
Developers should learn about broken builds, missing declarations, incompatible
|
||||
interfaces, and release-readiness gaps before those problems reach live
|
||||
application deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Boundaries Preserve Velocity
|
||||
|
||||
Enablement should make the layered architecture easier to use, not become a
|
||||
shortcut for mutating infrastructure, cluster, platform, or application
|
||||
responsibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What This Is (Conceptually)
|
||||
|
||||
This layer is:
|
||||
|
||||
* a **developer enablement** layer
|
||||
* a home for **CI/CD and GitOps workflow patterns**
|
||||
* a source of **workload templates, SDKs, and buildpacks**
|
||||
* a **promotion handoff** surface between source repos and S5 deployments
|
||||
* a future **developer portal** and self-service entry point
|
||||
* a place to codify delivery knowledge into **repeatable automation**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What This Is Not
|
||||
|
||||
This layer is not:
|
||||
|
||||
* the infrastructure substrate
|
||||
* the Kubernetes runtime
|
||||
* the shared platform-services layer
|
||||
* the application deployment and operations layer
|
||||
* the source-code home for business workloads
|
||||
* a replacement for repo-owned workplans, ADRs, or implementation decisions
|
||||
|
||||
It is the **delivery machinery** that helps the rest of Railiance change
|
||||
safely and repeatedly.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Direction of Evolution
|
||||
|
||||
This layer is expected to evolve toward:
|
||||
|
||||
* Standard **pipeline templates** for Railiance workloads
|
||||
* Reusable **build and image promotion** conventions
|
||||
* GitOps workflows with clear **review and rollback** expectations
|
||||
* Developer-facing **self-service templates** and portal entry points
|
||||
* SDKs and examples that make platform capabilities easy to consume correctly
|
||||
* Release evidence that S5 can use for **deployment readiness**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Guiding Question
|
||||
|
||||
> **How can Railiance make the correct delivery path the easiest path, so workloads can move from source to production with speed, evidence, and clear ownership?**
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user