Record whynot identity group evidence
This commit is contained in:
@@ -118,6 +118,15 @@ verification:
|
||||
- Positive login reported missing groups claim because the role did not request the groups scope.
|
||||
- Updated auth/netkingdom/role/whynot-design-workload-kv-read with oidc_scopes openid/profile/email/groups.
|
||||
- Added the 127.0.0.1 local CLI callback URI alongside localhost and browser callbacks.
|
||||
- at: '2026-06-28T14:01:47+00:00'
|
||||
actor: codex
|
||||
kind: non_secret_identity_group_check
|
||||
result: applied
|
||||
details:
|
||||
- Positive login advanced from missing groups claim to bound claim mismatch; this confirms the groups scope is now requested.
|
||||
- Live LLDAP group inventory did not contain whynot-design before this check.
|
||||
- Created and verified the whynot-design LLDAP group for the approved OpenBao bound claim.
|
||||
- No user membership was changed; positive verification still requires the authenticating account to be explicitly added to whynot-design.
|
||||
lifecycle:
|
||||
deactivate: Disable ops-warden catalog entry and remove or detach auth role policy.
|
||||
rotate: Replace NPM_AUTH_TOKEN value directly in OpenBao and record non-secret rotation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ This is the next-session handoff for `CCR-2026-0001` and the
|
||||
- Catalog id: `whynot-design-npm-publish`
|
||||
- Tenant/org: `coulomb`
|
||||
- Workload/project: `whynot-design`
|
||||
- Bound IAM group: `whynot-design`
|
||||
- Secret path: `platform/workloads/coulomb/whynot-design/npm-publish`
|
||||
- Field: `NPM_AUTH_TOKEN`
|
||||
- Token source: Gitea package token for
|
||||
@@ -24,6 +25,13 @@ binding and redirect URIs, the secret metadata has the expected catalog id, and
|
||||
the `NPM_AUTH_TOKEN` field is present. No secret value was printed, recorded,
|
||||
or copied into Git, State Hub, chat, or workplans.
|
||||
|
||||
On 2026-06-28, the attended positive OIDC login advanced from a missing
|
||||
`groups` claim to a bound-claim mismatch. That means the role now requests the
|
||||
`groups` scope correctly, but the authenticating identity is not a member of
|
||||
`whynot-design`. The `whynot-design` LLDAP group was created and verified; no
|
||||
user membership was changed. Add only the intended publisher/verifier identity
|
||||
to that group before retrying positive verification.
|
||||
|
||||
## Safety Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Do not paste `NPM_AUTH_TOKEN` into Git, State Hub, chat, shell history, logs,
|
||||
@@ -178,6 +186,16 @@ bao read auth/netkingdom/role/whynot-design-workload-kv-read
|
||||
Positive verification proves the approved whynot-design identity can fetch the
|
||||
field without exposing it in logs.
|
||||
|
||||
Before retrying, confirm the account used for OIDC login is a member of the
|
||||
`whynot-design` LLDAP group. If OpenBao reports:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
claim "groups" does not match any associated bound claim values
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
then the groups claim is present, but the account is not in `whynot-design` or
|
||||
KeyCape did not emit that membership in the fresh login.
|
||||
|
||||
Use an attended shell, keep tracing disabled, and suppress command output:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user