Confirm whynot credential binding
This commit is contained in:
@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
**2026-06-27:** Added file-backed `approve`, `deny`, and `needs-changes`
|
||||
commands that require reviewer and comment text and append non-secret review
|
||||
comments to the CCR. Added `status` plus Make targets
|
||||
comments to the CCR. Added `confirm-binding` for explicit non-secret auth
|
||||
binding confirmation. Added `status` plus Make targets
|
||||
`credential-change-status` and `credential-change-status-json` so ops-warden can
|
||||
consume `readiness`/`resolvable` without scraping prose. Remaining T05 work is
|
||||
State Hub decision-event emission and tighter chat integration.
|
||||
@@ -249,8 +250,9 @@ Acceptance:
|
||||
- ops-warden activates its catalog entry only after CCR verification.
|
||||
|
||||
**2026-06-27:** The whynot-design lane is represented as `CCR-2026-0001` and
|
||||
can be rendered for review. It remains proposed/unapproved with unconfirmed
|
||||
bound claims, so live apply and ops-warden activation are correctly blocked.
|
||||
can be rendered for review. The whynot-design bound claim was confirmed from
|
||||
operator chat context and recorded in the CCR, but it remains proposed/unapproved,
|
||||
so live apply and ops-warden activation are correctly blocked.
|
||||
|
||||
**2026-06-27:** Converted the ops-warden batch follow-up
|
||||
`fe5b1696-8956-4bd5-9d6f-dbde1901a076` into three proposed CCRs:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user