generated from coulomb/repo-seed
134 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
134 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: capability.registry.register
|
|
name: Capability Registration
|
|
summary: Register a new capability so it becomes visible for planning and implementation reuse.
|
|
owner: reuse-surface
|
|
status: draft
|
|
domain: helix_forge
|
|
tags:
|
|
- registry
|
|
- governance
|
|
- meta
|
|
|
|
maturity:
|
|
discovery:
|
|
current: D3
|
|
target: D5
|
|
confidence: medium
|
|
rationale: >
|
|
Core use case UC-RS-001 is documented in specs/UseCaseCatalog.md and the
|
|
registry model is bounded in INTENT.md, but concrete promotion workflows
|
|
are not yet grounded in registry artifacts.
|
|
availability:
|
|
current: A0
|
|
target: A3
|
|
confidence: medium
|
|
rationale: >
|
|
Registration is currently manual through Markdown entries and the index.
|
|
A CLI validator/query tool would raise availability to A3.
|
|
|
|
external_evidence:
|
|
completeness:
|
|
level: C1
|
|
name: Fragmentary
|
|
confidence: low
|
|
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
|
|
satisfied_expectations:
|
|
- capability IDs can be assigned in registry entries
|
|
- maturity vectors can be recorded at registration time
|
|
broken_expectations:
|
|
- no automated duplicate detection yet
|
|
- no promotion history tracking yet
|
|
out_of_scope_expectations:
|
|
- hosting registered capabilities
|
|
- enforcing implementation architecture
|
|
reliability:
|
|
level: R0
|
|
confidence: low
|
|
basis: consumer_quality_signals
|
|
known_reliability_risks:
|
|
- registry consistency depends on manual index maintenance
|
|
|
|
discovery:
|
|
intent: >
|
|
Make a capability candidate visible in the registry so humans and agents can
|
|
discover, assess, compare, and reuse it instead of rebuilding it in isolation.
|
|
includes:
|
|
- stable capability ID assignment
|
|
- initial discovery and availability classification
|
|
- explicit completeness and reliability placeholders
|
|
- evidence and relation references
|
|
excludes:
|
|
- implementing the registered capability
|
|
- certifying implementation quality
|
|
- operating runtime services for registered capabilities
|
|
assumptions:
|
|
- unregistered capabilities are invisible for registry-driven reuse
|
|
- low-maturity entries are acceptable when evidence gaps are explicit
|
|
use_cases:
|
|
- UC-RS-001
|
|
research_memos:
|
|
- specs/UseCaseCatalog.md
|
|
- specs/ProductRequirementsDocument.md
|
|
|
|
availability:
|
|
current_level: A0
|
|
target_level: A3
|
|
current_artifacts:
|
|
- templates/capability-entry.template.md
|
|
- registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml
|
|
target_artifacts:
|
|
- tools/validate-registry
|
|
- tools/query-registry
|
|
consumption_modes:
|
|
- informational
|
|
- markdown authoring
|
|
|
|
relations:
|
|
depends_on: []
|
|
supports:
|
|
- capability.feature-control.evaluate
|
|
- capability.identity.vocabulary-canonicalize
|
|
related_to:
|
|
- capability.registry.validate
|
|
|
|
evidence:
|
|
documentation:
|
|
- INTENT.md
|
|
- specs/UseCaseCatalog.md
|
|
tests: []
|
|
consumer_feedback: []
|
|
bug_reports: []
|
|
incidents: []
|
|
|
|
consumer_guidance:
|
|
recommended_for:
|
|
- making a new capability visible at D0/A0/C0/R0 with minimal friction
|
|
- seeding planning discussions before implementation exists
|
|
not_recommended_for:
|
|
- treating registry presence as proof of implementation readiness
|
|
- skipping explicit evidence for maturity promotion
|
|
known_limitations:
|
|
- manual index updates are required after adding an entry
|
|
- duplicate detection is guidance-only in the MVP
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Capability Registration
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
Registration is the entry point for reuse visibility. A capability that is not
|
|
registered cannot be discovered through the registry surface, even if code or
|
|
documentation exists elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
## Current reuse mode
|
|
|
|
Humans and agents add Markdown entries under `registry/capabilities/` and update
|
|
`registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml`. This is informational reuse (A0): read,
|
|
plan, and author entries.
|
|
|
|
## Next promotion steps
|
|
|
|
1. Attach concrete use cases and actors to reach D5.
|
|
2. Add a CLI validator to reach A3.
|
|
3. Record consumer expectations and broken expectations as external evidence. |