generated from coulomb/repo-seed
tegwick
f87f4e5e4d
Gitea's "project/package/release" terms are overloaded, so the catalog now uses the most explicit words: - org = coulomb (the Gitea organisation) - repo = whynot-design (the Gitea repository/product) — not an org, not a scope - npm scope @whynot and package @whynot/design are distinct from both Changes: - catalog schema: replace conflated `owner` with required `org` + `repo`; `owner` is now a derived `org/repo` slug property - npm-config delivery is data-driven: registry + scope live in delivery_config.npm and are validated; engine no longer hardcodes a registry - exec delivery writes `<scope>:registry=<url>` + scoped `:_authToken` for the configured Gitea registry (token still env-expanded, never written to disk) - pilot lane points at https://gitea.coulomb.social/api/packages/coulomb/npm/, scope @whynot, KV path coulomb/whynot-design/npm/publish - npm-publish-demo uses @whynot scope so dry-run resolves the Gitea registry - docs: terminology table; routing owner shown as coulomb/whynot-design - tests: org/repo required, npm-config validation, registry authkey mapping Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
secrets-engine
Headless, multi-application, multi-tenant secrets workflow and automation layer for approved secret custody, delivery, and lifecycle work across build, test, and production stages.
OpenBao remains the custody and enforcement backend. secrets-engine owns the
operator and agent interaction model: catalog, decision checks, plan/apply,
safe provisioning, verification, delivery, evidence, rotation, and deactivation.
Start Here
- INTENT.md - why this repository exists.
- ProductRequirementsDocument.md - product requirements and MVP scope.
- NetKingdom security infrastructure boundary pointer
- points to the canonical document in
net-kingdom/docs/, covering responsibilities and interactions with OpenBao, flex-auth, user-engine, ops-warden, ops-bridge, info-tech-canon, State Hub, and agents.
- points to the canonical document in
- Bootstrap MVP workplan - first implementation plan after State Hub bootstrap.
Core Direction
The MVP proves the whynot-design-npm-publish lane end to end:
- describe the lane in a non-secret catalog (
catalog/); - verify an approved decision (State Hub or local fixture);
- apply OpenBao policy/auth metadata through a stage-aware role;
- provision and verify the value without printing it;
- run a workload command through safe exec-time delivery.
Target command shape:
secrets-engine exec --catalog whynot-design-npm-publish -- npm publish
Quickstart
uv venv && uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
source .venv/bin/activate
secrets-engine catalog list
# Run the whole pilot chain live against a throwaway OpenBao dev server:
SECRETS_ENGINE_HUB_URL="" bash scripts/demo-e2e.sh
- CLI reference: docs/cli.md
- Stage roles & bootstrap tokens: docs/openbao-stage-roles.md
- ops-warden routing contract: docs/ops-warden-routing-contract.md
- Hardening backlog (exit bootstrap mode): docs/hardening-backlog.md
The implementation is a Python package (src/secrets_engine/). OpenBao is
reached only through the bao CLI adapter (openbao.py); the rest of the code
speaks in lanes and guarded plans.
Security Rules
- Do not put raw secret values in Git, State Hub, chat, prompts, issue comments, workplans, or normal logs.
- OpenBao is the backend custody and audit authority.
- Build, test, and production have separate policy boundaries.
- Production actions require approved decisions except explicit break-glass flows.
- Temporary bootstrap OpenBao credentials must live outside repos, use mode 0600, be revocable, and be removed after narrower auth is working.