generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Compare commits
8 Commits
00469c4cc0
...
main
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 498b7aa9a5 | |||
| ff95fb3971 | |||
| d20d21b21a | |||
| a3cec3f221 | |||
| b31409649c | |||
| 7bd6730744 | |||
| 9cb8992486 | |||
| 5ae4aba4a8 |
50
.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
Normal file
50
.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
||||
# Credential and access routing
|
||||
|
||||
**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
|
||||
for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
|
||||
login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
|
||||
|
||||
ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
|
||||
other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
|
||||
`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
|
||||
|
||||
### Lookup (do this first)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
|
||||
warden route show <catalog-id> --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent runtime | How to orient |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=vergabe-teilnahme` is for coordination, not secret vending |
|
||||
| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
|
||||
| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Quick routing table
|
||||
|
||||
| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
|
||||
| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
|
||||
| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
|
||||
| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
|
||||
| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
|
||||
| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
|
||||
|
||||
### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
|
||||
|
||||
- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
|
||||
- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
|
||||
- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
|
||||
|
||||
### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
|
||||
|
||||
Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
|
||||
(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
|
||||
every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
|
||||
get wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`
|
||||
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
||||
## First Session Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
Triggered when `get_domain_summary("vergabe_teilnahme")` shows **no workstreams**.
|
||||
Triggered when `get_domain_summary("communication")` shows **no workstreams**.
|
||||
The project is registered but work has not yet been structured.
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1 — Read, don't write**
|
||||
- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/vergabe_teilnahme/project_charter_v0.1.md` — purpose, scope
|
||||
- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/vergabe_teilnahme/roadmap_v0.1.md` — planned phases
|
||||
- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/communication/project_charter_v0.1.md` — purpose, scope
|
||||
- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/communication/roadmap_v0.1.md` — planned phases
|
||||
- Scan repo root: README, directory structure, existing code or docs
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2 — Survey in-progress work**
|
||||
@@ -17,20 +17,20 @@ roadmap phase. **Wait for approval before creating.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4 — Create workplan file first, then DB record (ADR-001)**
|
||||
```
|
||||
workplans/vergabe_teilnahme-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md ← write this first
|
||||
workplans/WP-NNNN-<slug>.md ← write this first
|
||||
```
|
||||
Then register in the hub:
|
||||
```
|
||||
create_workstream(topic_id="7d4d3e35-312f-4723-bde9-ddb43799109e", title="...", owner="...", description="...")
|
||||
create_workstream(topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc", title="...", owner="...", description="...")
|
||||
create_task(workstream_id="<id>", title="...", priority="high|medium|low")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 5 — Record the setup**
|
||||
```
|
||||
add_progress_event(
|
||||
summary="First session: structured vergabe_teilnahme into N workstreams, M tasks",
|
||||
summary="First session: structured communication into N workstreams, M tasks",
|
||||
event_type="milestone",
|
||||
topic_id="7d4d3e35-312f-4723-bde9-ddb43799109e",
|
||||
topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc",
|
||||
detail={"workstreams": [...], "tasks_created": M}
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
**Purpose:** Django 6 + Tailwind + HTMX bid management app
|
||||
**Purpose:** Coulomb project repository (bootstrapped from repo-seed template)
|
||||
|
||||
**Domain:** vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
**Repo slug:** vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
**Topic ID:** 7d4d3e35-312f-4723-bde9-ddb43799109e
|
||||
**Domain:** communication
|
||||
**Repo slug:** vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
**Topic ID:** 36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
||||
## Session Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
State Hub: http://127.0.0.1:8000
|
||||
Dev Hub (State Hub API): http://127.0.0.1:8000
|
||||
MCP server name in `~/.claude.json`: `dev-hub`
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1 — Orient**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +11,7 @@ cat .custodian-brief.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
Then call the MCP tool for richer cross-domain context when MCP tools are exposed:
|
||||
```
|
||||
get_domain_summary("vergabe_teilnahme")
|
||||
get_domain_summary("communication")
|
||||
```
|
||||
If MCP tools are unavailable in the current agent session, use the REST API:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
@@ -21,14 +22,14 @@ If the hub is offline: `cd ~/state-hub && make api`
|
||||
**Step 2 — Check inbox**
|
||||
With MCP tools:
|
||||
```
|
||||
get_messages(to_agent="vergabe_teilnahme", unread_only=True)
|
||||
get_messages(to_agent="vergabe-teilnahme", unread_only=True)
|
||||
```
|
||||
Mark read with `mark_message_read(message_id)`. Reply or act on coordination
|
||||
requests before proceeding.
|
||||
|
||||
Without MCP tools:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=vergabe_teilnahme&unread_only=true" \
|
||||
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=vergabe-teilnahme&unread_only=true" \
|
||||
| python3 -m json.tool
|
||||
curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
|
||||
-H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'
|
||||
@@ -39,12 +40,12 @@ curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
|
||||
ls workplans/
|
||||
```
|
||||
For each file with `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked`, note pending
|
||||
`todo`/`in_progress` tasks.
|
||||
`wait`/`todo`/`progress` tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4 — Present brief**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Active workstreams** for `vergabe_teilnahme` — title, task counts, blocking decisions
|
||||
2. **Pending tasks** from `workplans/` + any `[repo:vergabe_teilnahme]` hub tasks
|
||||
1. **Active workstreams** for `communication` — title, task counts, blocking decisions
|
||||
2. **Pending tasks** from `workplans/` + any `[repo:vergabe-teilnahme]` hub tasks
|
||||
3. **Goal guidance** — if `goal_guidance` in summary:
|
||||
- `needs_workplan`: surface as top action — *"Repo goal '{title}' has no workplan yet"*
|
||||
- `alignment_warnings`: flag if active work is not aligned with current goal
|
||||
@@ -61,23 +62,23 @@ If no workstreams: follow First Session Protocol (`first-session.md`).
|
||||
**Session close:**
|
||||
With MCP tools:
|
||||
```
|
||||
add_progress_event(summary="...", topic_id="7d4d3e35-312f-4723-bde9-ddb43799109e", workstream_id="<uuid>")
|
||||
add_progress_event(summary="...", topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc", workstream_id="<uuid>")
|
||||
```
|
||||
Without MCP tools:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ \
|
||||
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
|
||||
-d '{"topic_id":"7d4d3e35-312f-4723-bde9-ddb43799109e","workstream_id":"<uuid>","event_type":"note","summary":"what changed","author":"codex"}'
|
||||
-d '{"topic_id":"36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc","workstream_id":"<uuid>","event_type":"note","summary":"what changed","author":"codex"}'
|
||||
```
|
||||
If workplan files were modified, ensure the local copy is up to date first:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git -C <repo_path> pull --ff-only
|
||||
cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency REPO=vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency REPO=vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
```
|
||||
For repos where implementation runs on a remote machine (e.g. CoulombCore),
|
||||
use the combined target which pulls before fixing:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency-remote REPO=vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency-remote REPO=vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
```
|
||||
**C-15** (DB task ahead of file) is normal in multi-machine workflows — writeback
|
||||
will sync the file to match DB. **C-16** (repo behind remote) blocks all writes
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,32 +1,19 @@
|
||||
## Stack
|
||||
|
||||
- **Language:** Python 3.12 (Django 6), Node 22 (Vite + Tailwind v4)
|
||||
- **Key deps:** Django, htmx, Alpine.js, Tailwind v4, whynot-design (vendored
|
||||
under `static/src/vendor/whynot-design/`)
|
||||
<!-- TODO: Fill in language, frameworks, and key dependencies -->
|
||||
- **Language:**
|
||||
- **Key deps:**
|
||||
|
||||
## Dev Commands
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# TODO: Fill in the standard commands for this repo
|
||||
|
||||
# Install dependencies
|
||||
uv sync # Python
|
||||
npm ci # Node (Vite/Tailwind)
|
||||
|
||||
# Run dev stack
|
||||
make db # Start postgres if not running
|
||||
make dev # Django runserver on :9000
|
||||
make css # Tailwind/Vite watcher (rebuilds main.css)
|
||||
# Run tests
|
||||
|
||||
# Build CSS bundle for prod / for verification
|
||||
npm run build # → static/dist/main.css
|
||||
# Lint / type check
|
||||
|
||||
# Re-vendor the whynot-design system from a pinned upstream commit
|
||||
make sync-whynot-design # reads .whynot-design-ref by default
|
||||
# or: ./scripts/sync-whynot-design.sh <ref>
|
||||
|
||||
# Tests / lint
|
||||
make test # uv run pytest
|
||||
make lint # ruff + mypy
|
||||
# Build / package (if applicable)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
See `wiki/DesignSystem.md` for the whynot-design adoption status (Phase 1
|
||||
tokens+CSS done; Phase 2 components deferred) and local style conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
|
||||
|
||||
File location: `workplans/vergabe_teilnahme-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
|
||||
ID prefix: `VERGABE_TEILNAHME-WP`
|
||||
File location: `workplans/WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
|
||||
ID prefix: `WP-`
|
||||
|
||||
Work items originate as files in this repo **before** being registered in the hub.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ repo state, and `finished` when implementation is complete. `stalled` and
|
||||
`needs_review` are derived health labels, not stored statuses.
|
||||
|
||||
Closed workplans may be moved to `workplans/archived/` with a completion-date
|
||||
prefix: `YYMMDD-vergabe_teilnahme-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The frontmatter id remains
|
||||
prefix: `YYMMDD-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The frontmatter id remains
|
||||
unchanged; the prefix is only for quick visual reference.
|
||||
|
||||
Small opportunistic tasks discovered during another session use **Ad Hoc Tasks**:
|
||||
@@ -21,8 +21,20 @@ Small opportunistic tasks discovered during another session use **Ad Hoc Tasks**
|
||||
directly. Promote anything requiring analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or
|
||||
multiple planned phases into a normal workplan.
|
||||
|
||||
Ecosystem todos from other agents arrive as `[repo:vergabe_teilnahme]` hub tasks —
|
||||
Ecosystem todos from other agents arrive as `[repo:vergabe-teilnahme]` hub tasks —
|
||||
visible at session start. Pick one up by creating the workplan file, then registering
|
||||
the workstream.
|
||||
|
||||
Task blocks use this shape:
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: WP-NNNN-T01
|
||||
status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
|
||||
priority: high | medium | low
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>" # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Status progression is `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting or
|
||||
blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Ralph Loop rules and HEUREKA sequence: ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md — do not duplicate here -->
|
||||
|
||||
19
.repo-classification.yaml
Normal file
19
.repo-classification.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
repo_classification:
|
||||
standard: Repo Classification Standard
|
||||
version: '1.0'
|
||||
classified_at: '2026-06-22'
|
||||
classified_by: agent
|
||||
category: experimental
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
capability_tags:
|
||||
- marketplace
|
||||
- collaboration
|
||||
- procurement
|
||||
- governance
|
||||
business_stake:
|
||||
- product
|
||||
- sales
|
||||
business_mechanics:
|
||||
- coordination
|
||||
- operation
|
||||
99
AGENTS.md
99
AGENTS.md
@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Repo Identity
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** Django 6 + Tailwind + HTMX bid management app
|
||||
**Purpose:** Coulomb project repository (bootstrapped from repo-seed template)
|
||||
|
||||
**Domain:** vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
**Repo slug:** vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
**Topic ID:** `7d4d3e35-312f-4723-bde9-ddb43799109e`
|
||||
**Workplan prefix:** `VERGABE_TEILNAHME-WP-`
|
||||
**Domain:** communication
|
||||
**Repo slug:** vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
**Topic ID:** `36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc`
|
||||
**Workplan prefix:** `WP-`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ there is no MCP server for Codex agents.
|
||||
cat .custodian-brief.md
|
||||
|
||||
# Active workstreams for this domain
|
||||
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/workstreams/?topic_id=7d4d3e35-312f-4723-bde9-ddb43799109e&status=active" \
|
||||
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/workstreams/?topic_id=36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc&status=active" \
|
||||
| python3 -m json.tool
|
||||
|
||||
# Check inbox
|
||||
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=vergabe_teilnahme&unread_only=true" \
|
||||
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=vergabe-teilnahme&unread_only=true" \
|
||||
| python3 -m json.tool
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ Omit `workstream_id` / `task_id` when not applicable.
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
|
||||
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
|
||||
-d '{"status": "in_progress"}'
|
||||
# values: todo | in_progress | done | blocked
|
||||
-d '{"status": "progress"}'
|
||||
# values: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Flag a task for human review
|
||||
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
|
||||
|
||||
**Start:**
|
||||
1. `cat .custodian-brief.md` — domain goal and open workstreams (offline-safe)
|
||||
2. Check inbox: `GET /messages/?to_agent=vergabe_teilnahme&unread_only=true`; mark read
|
||||
2. Check inbox: `GET /messages/?to_agent=vergabe-teilnahme&unread_only=true`; mark read
|
||||
3. Scan workplans: `ls workplans/` — note `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked` files and open tasks
|
||||
4. Check blocked tasks: `GET /tasks/?needs_human=true`
|
||||
4. Check human-needed tasks: `GET /tasks/?needs_human=true`
|
||||
|
||||
**During work:**
|
||||
- Update task statuses in workplan files as tasks progress
|
||||
@@ -95,21 +95,78 @@ curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
|
||||
3. Note for the custodian operator: after workplan file changes, run from
|
||||
`~/state-hub`:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
make fix-consistency REPO=vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
make fix-consistency REPO=vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
```
|
||||
This syncs task status from files into the hub DB.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Credential and access routing
|
||||
|
||||
**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
|
||||
for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
|
||||
login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
|
||||
|
||||
ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
|
||||
other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
|
||||
`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
|
||||
|
||||
### Lookup (do this first)
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
|
||||
warden route show <catalog-id> --json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent runtime | How to orient |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=vergabe-teilnahme` is for coordination, not secret vending |
|
||||
| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
|
||||
| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Quick routing table
|
||||
|
||||
| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
|
||||
| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
|
||||
| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
|
||||
| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
|
||||
| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
|
||||
| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
|
||||
|
||||
### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
|
||||
|
||||
- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
|
||||
- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
|
||||
- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
|
||||
|
||||
### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
|
||||
|
||||
Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
|
||||
(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
|
||||
every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
|
||||
get wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- REPO-AGENTS-EXTENSIONS -->
|
||||
<!-- Append repo-specific agent instructions below this marker.
|
||||
The state-hub template sync preserves content after this line. -->
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
|
||||
|
||||
Work items originate as files in this repo — not in the hub. The hub is a
|
||||
read/cache/index layer that rebuilds from files.
|
||||
|
||||
**File location:** `workplans/VERGABE_TEILNAHME-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
|
||||
**File location:** `workplans/VERGABE-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Archived location:** finished workplans may move to
|
||||
`workplans/archived/YYMMDD-VERGABE_TEILNAHME-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The `YYMMDD` prefix is
|
||||
`workplans/archived/YYMMDD-VERGABE-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The `YYMMDD` prefix is
|
||||
the completion/archive date; the frontmatter `id` does not change.
|
||||
|
||||
**Ad Hoc Tasks:** small opportunistic fixes discovered during a session use
|
||||
@@ -121,11 +178,11 @@ anything needing analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or multiple phases.
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: VERGABE_TEILNAHME-WP-NNNN
|
||||
id: VERGABE-WP-NNNN
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "..."
|
||||
domain: vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
repo: vergabe_teilnahme
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
repo: vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
status: proposed | ready | active | blocked | backlog | finished | archived
|
||||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: ...
|
||||
@@ -145,8 +202,8 @@ derived health labels, not frontmatter statuses.
|
||||
## Task Title
|
||||
|
||||
` ` `task
|
||||
id: VERGABE_TEILNAHME-WP-NNNN-T01
|
||||
status: todo | in_progress | done | blocked
|
||||
id: VERGABE-WP-NNNN-T01
|
||||
status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
|
||||
priority: high | medium | low
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>" # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
|
||||
` ` `
|
||||
@@ -154,9 +211,9 @@ state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>" # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
|
||||
Task description text.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Status progression: `todo` → `in_progress` → `done` (or `blocked`)
|
||||
Status progression: `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting/blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
|
||||
|
||||
To create a new workplan:
|
||||
1. Write the file following the format above
|
||||
2. Notify the custodian operator to run `make fix-consistency REPO=vergabe_teilnahme`
|
||||
2. Notify the custodian operator to run `make fix-consistency REPO=vergabe-teilnahme`
|
||||
(or send a message to the hub agent via `POST /messages/`)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,4 +8,5 @@
|
||||
@.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md
|
||||
@.claude/rules/architecture.md
|
||||
@.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md
|
||||
@.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
|
||||
@.claude/rules/agents.md
|
||||
|
||||
159
SCOPE.md
159
SCOPE.md
@@ -8,130 +8,147 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## One-liner
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Describe the purpose of this repository in one precise sentence. -->
|
||||
<!-- Example: "Provides a lightweight event router for Kubernetes-native systems." -->
|
||||
Web application that structures a company's participation in tenders
|
||||
(Ausschreibungen) end-to-end, from research through submission to
|
||||
post-award retrospective.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Idea
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- What is the main capability or idea behind this repository? -->
|
||||
<!-- What problem does it try to solve? -->
|
||||
**Vergabe Teilnahme** ("tender participation") guides a team through the
|
||||
full lifecycle of bidding on a public or private tender: collecting tender
|
||||
documents, analyzing requirements, deciding whether to participate, tracking
|
||||
open items, finalizing pricing and documents, submitting on time, and
|
||||
capturing reusable knowledge afterwards — win or lose. It is phase-guided,
|
||||
never phase-locked: every element of a tender is reachable at any time, and
|
||||
there is no forced completeness outside real submission-deadline
|
||||
constraints. All data entry is manual in this first build stage — no
|
||||
automated ingestion from tender platforms.
|
||||
|
||||
It operates on three levels, per `wiki/ProductRequirementsDocument.md`:
|
||||
|
||||
| Level | Content |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Operational | deadlines, documents, tasks, lots (Lose), requirements, bidder questions, submission |
|
||||
| Management | participate/no-bid decision, approvals, pricing level, subcontractor selection, outcome, retrospective |
|
||||
| Strategic | reusable evidence/references, market price observation, loss reasons, win factors, competitor (Marktbegleiter) analysis |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## In Scope
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- What this repository is responsible for. -->
|
||||
<!-- Be explicit and concrete. -->
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
- Tender (Ausschreibung) and lot (Los) tracking through 8 navigable phases
|
||||
- Requirements analysis and bidder-question (Bieterfragen) handling
|
||||
- Task management (Aufgaben) scoped to a tender or a lot
|
||||
- Document management (Dokumente) for tender materials and submission artifacts
|
||||
- Pricing (Preise) tracking per lot/tender
|
||||
- Submission and post-award retrospective (Abgabe/Nachbetrachtung)
|
||||
- Partner and reference library (Partner/Bibliothek) for reusable evidence
|
||||
- Competitor/market observation (Marktbegleiter)
|
||||
- Feedback/bug capture within the app (Feedback)
|
||||
- Issue-tracking integration via `issue-core` (task facade, not a UI replacement)
|
||||
|
||||
## Out of Scope
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- What this repository deliberately does NOT do. -->
|
||||
<!-- This is often more important than "In Scope". -->
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
- External user accounts for partners/subcontractors/service providers (data
|
||||
objects only in this build stage, no system access of their own)
|
||||
- Multi-tenancy
|
||||
- Automated ingestion from tender platforms, SharePoint, Teams, CRM, ERP,
|
||||
email, or calendars (deliberately manual-entry-first for v1)
|
||||
- Certification or legal validity of submissions — the system tracks
|
||||
process state, it is not a legal compliance authority
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Relevant When
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- When should someone consider using or exploring this repository? -->
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
- Deciding whether to bid on a tender and needing structured deadline,
|
||||
document, and requirement tracking across a team
|
||||
- Needing a system of record for pricing decisions, submission evidence,
|
||||
and post-award retrospectives on public/private tenders
|
||||
- Wanting to reuse prior tender evidence, references, or competitor/pricing
|
||||
observations when evaluating a new tender
|
||||
|
||||
## Not Relevant When
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- When should someone ignore this repository? -->
|
||||
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
-
|
||||
- Needing external bidder/partner portal access (not built yet)
|
||||
- Needing automated tender discovery or platform integration (out of scope
|
||||
for this build stage)
|
||||
- Needing generic project management unrelated to the tender-participation
|
||||
domain
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Current State
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Rough indication of maturity. No strict format required. -->
|
||||
|
||||
- Status: <!-- e.g. concept / experimental / active / stable / deprecated -->
|
||||
- Implementation: <!-- e.g. idea / partial / substantial / complete -->
|
||||
- Stability: <!-- e.g. unstable / evolving / stable -->
|
||||
- Usage: <!-- e.g. none / personal / internal / production -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Add any notes that help set expectations. -->
|
||||
- Status: active
|
||||
- Implementation: substantial — 12 Django apps covering the full phase
|
||||
model (accounts, aufgaben, ausschreibungen, bibliothek, core, dokumente,
|
||||
feedback, lose, marktbegleiter, nachbetrachtung, partner, preise); 17
|
||||
workplans (WP-0001–WP-0017) implemented in sequence from project
|
||||
scaffold through whynot-design token adoption
|
||||
- Stability: evolving — manual-entry-first v1; no CI workflow configured yet
|
||||
(`.gitea/`/`.forgejo/` absent)
|
||||
- Usage: internal collaboration tool, not yet published for external use
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Fits
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Where does this repository sit in the bigger picture? -->
|
||||
|
||||
- Upstream dependencies:
|
||||
- Downstream consumers:
|
||||
- Often used with:
|
||||
- Upstream dependencies: `issue-core` (task-tracking facade, see
|
||||
`vergabe_teilnahme/apps/aufgaben/issue_facade.py`), `whynot-design`
|
||||
(visual language, vendored CSS/tokens)
|
||||
- Downstream consumers: none known
|
||||
- Often used with: `railiance-apps` (deployment target per its own SCOPE.md,
|
||||
which names `vergabe-teilnahme` as a user-facing service it deploys)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Terminology
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Terms that are important to understand this repo. -->
|
||||
<!-- Especially useful if naming differs from other repos. -->
|
||||
|
||||
- Preferred terms:
|
||||
- Also known as:
|
||||
- Potentially confusing terms:
|
||||
- Preferred terms: Ausschreibung (tender), Los (lot), Aufgabe (task),
|
||||
Marktbegleiter (competitor/market companion), Nachbetrachtung (post-award
|
||||
retrospective)
|
||||
- Also known as: "Vergabe Teilnahme" (product name), "tender participation
|
||||
management system" (English gloss)
|
||||
- Potentially confusing terms: "Partner" here means reference/subcontractor
|
||||
data objects, not system users
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Related / Overlapping Repositories
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- List repositories that have similar or adjacent responsibilities. -->
|
||||
<!-- Helps detect duplication and navigate the ecosystem. -->
|
||||
|
||||
- <repo-name> — <!-- how it relates -->
|
||||
- `issue-core` — task-tracking backend consumed via `issue_facade.py`
|
||||
- `whynot-design` — visual language vendored into `static/src/vendor/`
|
||||
- `railiance-apps` — deployment/workload layer for this service
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Getting Oriented
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- If someone decides to look deeper, where should they start? -->
|
||||
|
||||
- Start with:
|
||||
- Key files / directories:
|
||||
- Entry points:
|
||||
- Start with: `wiki/ProductRequirementsDocument.md` (product intent, in
|
||||
German), `wiki/ArchitectureBlueprint.md` (technology stack and design
|
||||
principles)
|
||||
- Key files / directories: `vergabe_teilnahme/apps/` (12 domain apps),
|
||||
`vergabe_teilnahme/urls.py` (route map), `workplans/` (WP-0001–0017
|
||||
build history)
|
||||
- Entry points: `manage.py runserver`; `vergabe_teilnahme/urls.py` maps
|
||||
`/ausschreibungen/`, `/lose/`, `/aufgaben/`, `/dokumente/`, and more
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Provided Capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- What can this repo's domain provide to other domains on request? -->
|
||||
<!-- Each capability block is parsed by the state-hub capability catalog ingest. -->
|
||||
<!-- Remove the examples and add your own, or leave empty if none. -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
```capability
|
||||
type: infrastructure
|
||||
title: Example capability title
|
||||
description: What this capability provides, in one or two sentences.
|
||||
keywords: [keyword1, keyword2, keyword3]
|
||||
```
|
||||
-->
|
||||
Registered in `registry/capabilities/capability.procurement.vergabe-teilnahme.md`
|
||||
(reuse-surface federation; vector **D3/A1/C1/R1** after SCOPE.md fill-in and
|
||||
REUSE-WP-0017-T05 entry-2 review, 2026-07-07).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Anything else worth knowing. Keep it short. -->
|
||||
Product and architecture documentation (`wiki/`) is in German; this SCOPE.md
|
||||
is in English per the reuse-surface registry's Markdown-first, agent-facing
|
||||
convention. Refer to `wiki/ProductRequirementsDocument.md` for the
|
||||
authoritative German-language product definition.
|
||||
|
||||
12
registry/README.md
Normal file
12
registry/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
# Capability Registry
|
||||
|
||||
Markdown-first capability index for federation and reuse planning.
|
||||
|
||||
## Authoring
|
||||
|
||||
1. Copy a capability entry template (see reuse-surface `templates/capability-entry.template.md`).
|
||||
2. Add the row to `indexes/capabilities.yaml`.
|
||||
3. Run `reuse-surface validate` from a checkout with the CLI installed.
|
||||
4. Merge to `main` and verify publish with `reuse-surface establish --publish-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
Federation contract: reuse-surface `docs/RegistryFederation.md`.
|
||||
0
registry/capabilities/.gitkeep
Normal file
0
registry/capabilities/.gitkeep
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: capability.procurement.vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
name: Vergabe Teilnahme (Public Procurement Participation) Application
|
||||
summary: Django application (with a Vite/Tailwind frontend) for managing German public-procurement (Vergabe)
|
||||
tender participation — Ausschreibungs- und Teilnahme-Management-System.
|
||||
owner: vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- procurement
|
||||
- django
|
||||
- vergabe
|
||||
maturity:
|
||||
discovery:
|
||||
current: D3
|
||||
target: D4
|
||||
confidence: medium
|
||||
rationale: SCOPE.md filled 2026-07-07 with in/out scope, current state, terminology, and orientation
|
||||
pointers; supported by wiki/ProductRequirementsDocument.md (German product definition) and
|
||||
wiki/ArchitectureBlueprint.md. README.md remains a stale repo-seed leftover — SCOPE and wiki
|
||||
are authoritative for discovery.
|
||||
availability:
|
||||
current: A1
|
||||
target: A3
|
||||
confidence: medium
|
||||
rationale: Substantial Django application (12 domain apps, WP-0001–WP-0017 implemented) with
|
||||
Vite/Tailwind frontend and docker-compose dev/test; SCOPE.md describes internal collaboration
|
||||
use only — no hosted production deployment confirmed in this review.
|
||||
external_evidence:
|
||||
completeness:
|
||||
level: C1
|
||||
confidence: medium
|
||||
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
|
||||
satisfied_expectations:
|
||||
- in-scope/out-of-scope boundaries documented in SCOPE.md
|
||||
- 8-phase tender participation model described with operational/management/strategic levels
|
||||
- manual-entry-first v1 constraint and external-portal exclusion explicit
|
||||
broken_expectations: []
|
||||
out_of_scope_expectations: []
|
||||
reliability:
|
||||
level: R1
|
||||
confidence: low
|
||||
basis: consumer_quality_signals
|
||||
known_reliability_risks:
|
||||
- no CI workflow configured yet (per SCOPE.md current state)
|
||||
- no production consumer telemetry (REUSE-WP-0019)
|
||||
- README.md still stale repo-seed text — fix separately
|
||||
discovery:
|
||||
intent: Guide a team through the full lifecycle of bidding on public or private tenders (Ausschreibungen)
|
||||
— from research and participate/no-bid decisions through submission and post-award retrospective.
|
||||
includes:
|
||||
- tender (Ausschreibung) and lot (Los) tracking across 8 navigable phases
|
||||
- requirements analysis and bidder-question (Bieterfragen) handling
|
||||
- tasks (Aufgaben), documents (Dokumente), pricing (Preise), submission/retrospective (Abgabe/Nachbetrachtung)
|
||||
- partner/reference library (Bibliothek) and competitor observation (Marktbegleiter)
|
||||
- issue-core task facade integration (not a UI replacement)
|
||||
excludes:
|
||||
- external partner/subcontractor portal accounts (data objects only in v1)
|
||||
- multi-tenancy
|
||||
- automated ingestion from tender platforms, SharePoint, Teams, CRM, ERP, email, or calendars
|
||||
assumptions: []
|
||||
use_cases: []
|
||||
research_memos: []
|
||||
availability:
|
||||
current_level: A1
|
||||
target_level: A3
|
||||
current_artifacts:
|
||||
- Django application (`vergabe_teilnahme`, 12 apps)
|
||||
- Vite/Tailwind frontend (`static/`)
|
||||
- docker-compose.dev.yml and docker-compose.test.yml
|
||||
target_artifacts: []
|
||||
consumption_modes:
|
||||
- application (Django + Vite, local dev via docker-compose)
|
||||
relations:
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- capability.infotech.issue-tracking
|
||||
supports: []
|
||||
related_to:
|
||||
- capability.design.whynot-system
|
||||
evidence:
|
||||
documentation:
|
||||
- SCOPE.md
|
||||
- wiki/ProductRequirementsDocument.md
|
||||
- wiki/ArchitectureBlueprint.md
|
||||
- pyproject.toml
|
||||
tests:
|
||||
- vergabe_teilnahme/apps/*/tests.py (pytest-django suite across domain apps)
|
||||
- docker-compose.test.yml
|
||||
consumer_feedback: []
|
||||
bug_reports: []
|
||||
incidents: []
|
||||
consumer_guidance:
|
||||
recommended_for:
|
||||
- teams needing structured German tender-participation workflow tracking (manual-entry-first v1)
|
||||
- extending or deploying this specific Django application
|
||||
not_recommended_for:
|
||||
- automated tender-platform ingestion (out of scope for v1)
|
||||
- external bidder/partner self-service portals (not built)
|
||||
known_limitations:
|
||||
- manual data entry only in v1 — no platform integration
|
||||
- README.md is still repo-seed boilerplate; use SCOPE.md and wiki/ for orientation
|
||||
promotion_history:
|
||||
- date: "2026-07-07"
|
||||
dimension: discovery
|
||||
from: D1
|
||||
to: D3
|
||||
rationale: SCOPE.md filled with full in/out scope and current-state documentation (REUSE-WP-0017-T05 entry-2 review).
|
||||
author: grok
|
||||
- date: "2026-07-07"
|
||||
dimension: completeness
|
||||
from: C0
|
||||
to: C1
|
||||
rationale: Consumer scope expectations now documented in SCOPE.md and wiki PRD.
|
||||
author: grok
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Vergabe Teilnahme (Public Procurement Participation) Application
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
`vergabe-teilnahme` is a Django + Vite/Tailwind application for managing German public-procurement (Vergabe) tender participation end-to-end. SCOPE.md (filled 2026-07-07) documents the 8-phase, manual-entry-first v1 model across 12 Django apps.
|
||||
|
||||
## Assessment notes
|
||||
|
||||
### Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
SCOPE.md now provides authoritative in/out scope, current state, terminology, and pointers to the German-language wiki PRD and architecture blueprint. Discovery promoted from D1 to D3; README cleanup remains a separate hygiene item.
|
||||
|
||||
### Availability
|
||||
|
||||
Substantial implemented application (WP-0001–WP-0017) with local docker-compose paths. Held at A1 until a hosted deployment path is confirmed (railiance-apps is named as deployment target in SCOPE.md).
|
||||
|
||||
### Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
Scope-vs-intent expectations are now documented (C1). Feature completeness against the full PRD is not independently verified in this review.
|
||||
|
||||
### Reliability
|
||||
|
||||
Pytest-django suite exists across domain apps (structural R1). No CI workflow or production telemetry yet.
|
||||
|
||||
## Promotion checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] ID follows `capability.<domain>.<name>` pattern
|
||||
- [x] Maturity enums match `specs/CapabilityMaturityStandard.md`
|
||||
- [x] `external_evidence` is populated separately from `maturity`
|
||||
- [x] Relations reference valid capability IDs
|
||||
- [x] Index entry added in `registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml`
|
||||
19
registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml
Normal file
19
registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
updated: '2026-07-07'
|
||||
domain: helix_forge
|
||||
capabilities:
|
||||
- id: capability.procurement.vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
name: Vergabe Teilnahme (Public Procurement Participation) Application
|
||||
summary: Django application (with a Vite/Tailwind frontend) for managing German public-procurement (Vergabe)
|
||||
tender participation — Ausschreibungs- und Teilnahme-Management-System.
|
||||
vector: D3 / A1 / C1 / R1
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
owner: vergabe-teilnahme
|
||||
path: registry/capabilities/capability.procurement.vergabe-teilnahme.md
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- procurement
|
||||
- django
|
||||
- vergabe
|
||||
consumption_modes:
|
||||
- application (Django + Vite, local dev via docker-compose)
|
||||
33
uv.lock
generated
33
uv.lock
generated
@@ -362,38 +362,15 @@ wheels = [
|
||||
[[package]]
|
||||
name = "issue-core"
|
||||
version = "0.2.0"
|
||||
source = { directory = "../issue-core" }
|
||||
source = { registry = "https://gitea.coulomb.social/api/packages/coulomb/pypi/simple/" }
|
||||
dependencies = [
|
||||
{ name = "click" },
|
||||
{ name = "python-dateutil" },
|
||||
{ name = "requests" },
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
[package.metadata]
|
||||
requires-dist = [
|
||||
{ name = "black", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=22.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "click", specifier = ">=8.0.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "fastapi", marker = "extra == 'api'", specifier = ">=0.110,<1.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "fastapi", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=0.110,<1.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "flake8", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=4.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "httpx", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=0.27" },
|
||||
{ name = "isort", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=5.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "jira", marker = "extra == 'jira'", specifier = ">=3.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "mypy", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=0.900" },
|
||||
{ name = "pre-commit", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=2.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "pydantic", marker = "extra == 'api'", specifier = ">=2.0,<3.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "pydantic", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=2.0,<3.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "pygithub", marker = "extra == 'github'", specifier = ">=1.55" },
|
||||
{ name = "pytest", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=6.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "pytest-cov", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=2.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "pytest-mock", marker = "extra == 'dev'", specifier = ">=3.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "python-dateutil", specifier = ">=2.8.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "requests", specifier = ">=2.25.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "requests", marker = "extra == 'gitea'", specifier = ">=2.25.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "sphinx", marker = "extra == 'docs'", specifier = ">=4.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "sphinx-click", marker = "extra == 'docs'", specifier = ">=3.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "sphinx-rtd-theme", marker = "extra == 'docs'", specifier = ">=1.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "uvicorn", extras = ["standard"], marker = "extra == 'api'", specifier = ">=0.27,<1.0" },
|
||||
sdist = { url = "http://gitea.coulomb.social/api/packages/coulomb/pypi/files/issue-core/0.2.0/issue_core-0.2.0.tar.gz", hash = "sha256:cd456ccafdf540f02f7f8b1326e28f8acebcfa0476f3ea2245bd2a5230d85a8d" }
|
||||
wheels = [
|
||||
{ url = "http://gitea.coulomb.social/api/packages/coulomb/pypi/files/issue-core/0.2.0/issue_core-0.2.0-py3-none-any.whl", hash = "sha256:f98b90a13c787095834dbc7ff8b14057718884e01a51c6b13206e438ba1d5f90" },
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
[[package]]
|
||||
@@ -791,7 +768,7 @@ requires-dist = [
|
||||
{ name = "django", specifier = ">=5.2" },
|
||||
{ name = "django-storages", specifier = ">=1.14" },
|
||||
{ name = "gunicorn", specifier = ">=22.0" },
|
||||
{ name = "issue-core", directory = "../issue-core" },
|
||||
{ name = "issue-core", specifier = ">=0.2,<0.3", index = "https://gitea.coulomb.social/api/packages/coulomb/pypi/simple/" },
|
||||
{ name = "psycopg", extras = ["binary"], specifier = ">=3.2" },
|
||||
{ name = "python-decouple", specifier = ">=3.8" },
|
||||
{ name = "whitenoise", specifier = ">=6.7" },
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ title: Projektgerüst — Django-Setup, Tailwind, Dev-Stack
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
phase: 1-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0001 — Projektgerüst
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 2-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0001
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0002 — Fachmodelle
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 3-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0002
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0003 — Basis-UI
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 4-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0003
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0004 — Dashboard und Ausschreibungen-CRUD
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 5-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0004
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0005 — Lose und Anforderungen
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 6-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0005
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0006 — Aufgaben und Bieterfragen
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 7-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0006
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0007 — Dokumentenmanagement
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 8-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0007
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0008 — Preise und Marktpreisauswertung
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 9-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0008
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0009 — Abgabe (Phase 6/7) und Nachbetrachtung (Phase 8)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 10-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0009
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0010 — Subunternehmer, Partner und Bibliothek
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 11-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0010
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0011 — Marktbegleiter-Analyse
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 12-of-12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-08"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0011
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0012 — Querschnitt
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 13-of-13
|
||||
created: "2026-05-14"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0012
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0013 — Feedback-Bugs
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 14-of-n
|
||||
created: "2026-05-14"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0013
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0014 — Aufgaben-Phasenzuordnung und Scores
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 15-of-n
|
||||
created: "2026-05-14"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0014
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0015 — Aufgaben: Verknüpfungen, implizite Fälligkeit, Issue-Facade
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: done
|
||||
phase: 16-of-n
|
||||
created: "2026-05-14"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0015
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0016 — Issue-Facade Integration
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ status: finished
|
||||
phase: 17-of-n
|
||||
created: "2026-05-23"
|
||||
depends_on: WP-0016
|
||||
domain: communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# WP-0017 — whynot-design Adoption · Phase 1 (Tokens + CSS)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user