Record whynot positive fetch verification
This commit is contained in:
@@ -127,6 +127,16 @@ verification:
|
||||
- Live LLDAP group inventory did not contain whynot-design before this check.
|
||||
- Created and verified the whynot-design LLDAP group for the approved OpenBao bound claim.
|
||||
- No user membership was changed; positive verification still requires the authenticating account to be explicitly added to whynot-design.
|
||||
- at: '2026-06-28T15:22:29+00:00'
|
||||
actor: bernd.worsch
|
||||
kind: positive_fetch_verification
|
||||
result: passed
|
||||
details:
|
||||
- Attended OIDC login for auth/netkingdom/role/whynot-design-workload-kv-read succeeded with workload-kv-read-whynot-design-npm-publish policy.
|
||||
- NPM_AUTH_TOKEN field fetch from platform/workloads/coulomb/whynot-design/npm-publish exited successfully with output redirected to /dev/null.
|
||||
- The secret value was not printed or recorded.
|
||||
- A short-lived OpenBao client token was printed by the CLI login output and was revoked by accessor immediately after the report.
|
||||
- Negative denial verification is still pending; keep the front door non-resolvable until it passes.
|
||||
lifecycle:
|
||||
deactivate: Disable ops-warden catalog entry and remove or detach auth role policy.
|
||||
rotate: Replace NPM_AUTH_TOKEN value directly in OpenBao and record non-secret rotation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ This is the next-session handoff for `CCR-2026-0001` and the
|
||||
- Decision: `e6381a56-6b04-4fd5-b2de-f3ef59cde888`
|
||||
- Status: applied; non-secret OpenBao apply checks passed 2026-06-28
|
||||
- Front door: `applied-pending-verify`, `resolvable=false`
|
||||
- Positive verification: passed 2026-06-28; negative verification pending
|
||||
- Catalog id: `whynot-design-npm-publish`
|
||||
- Tenant/org: `coulomb`
|
||||
- Workload/project: `whynot-design`
|
||||
@@ -28,9 +29,9 @@ or copied into Git, State Hub, chat, or workplans.
|
||||
On 2026-06-28, the attended positive OIDC login advanced from a missing
|
||||
`groups` claim to a bound-claim mismatch. That means the role now requests the
|
||||
`groups` scope correctly, but the authenticating identity is not a member of
|
||||
`whynot-design`. The `whynot-design` LLDAP group was created and verified; no
|
||||
user membership was changed. Add only the intended publisher/verifier identity
|
||||
to that group before retrying positive verification.
|
||||
`whynot-design`. The `whynot-design` LLDAP group was created and verified.
|
||||
The intended publisher/verifier identity was later added, and positive
|
||||
verification passed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Safety Rules
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -196,11 +197,16 @@ claim "groups" does not match any associated bound claim values
|
||||
then the groups claim is present, but the account is not in `whynot-design` or
|
||||
KeyCape did not emit that membership in the fresh login.
|
||||
|
||||
The positive verification passed on 2026-06-28. During that run, the CLI printed
|
||||
the short-lived OpenBao login token; it was revoked immediately by accessor.
|
||||
Prefer `bao login -no-print` for future attended verification if the installed
|
||||
CLI accepts that flag.
|
||||
|
||||
Use an attended shell, keep tracing disabled, and suppress command output:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
set +x
|
||||
bao login -method=oidc -path=netkingdom role=whynot-design-workload-kv-read
|
||||
bao login -no-print -method=oidc -path=netkingdom role=whynot-design-workload-kv-read
|
||||
bao kv get -format=json platform/workloads/coulomb/whynot-design/npm-publish \
|
||||
| jq -e '.data.data.NPM_AUTH_TOKEN | type == "string" and length > 0' \
|
||||
>/dev/null
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user